No tournaments this Fall?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think, if the general consensus is that it's too much of a risk to cross into a bordering state to play, then it's too much of a risk to play period. How can you convince the average parent that it's OK to play against Arlington but not OK to play against SAC. If it's not OK, then it's not OK.

Conversely, if it's OK to practice with your team or go to school, then it should be fine to play against anybody. For the bubble parents, obviously it's not OK to practice with your own team or to have your kid in school.

I think it's a big difference between parents sending their kid to school in uncertain times vs sending their kid to play soccer. With that said, I agree that, if teams are able to practice 100% unrestricted, then it should matter if you play games and who you play against.

The value of school is certainly greater than any outdoor spot for kids, but the frequency of touching and breathing in the same closed environments makes the incremental risk of catching covid in outdoor athletic activity miniscule. A tiny tiny increment to a pretty small risk.

When you are social distancing not when you are playing a contact sport.

All small. And social distancing and real school equals pure fantasy.