Former DA players not planning to participate in GA

[Anonymous]

06
MU >
Mclean or possibly Loudoun

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like how you loaded the survey to invite responses only from those who don’t plan to participate so it looks like the numbers are a greater proportion than they are.

Lol. So far the numbers are 3.

In all seriousness the amount of movement will be on par with almost any normal year.

Actually net 1 since one was moving from ECNL to a GA team

Actually reinforcing the point that with the new league stabilizing the previous status quo a bit that more normal player movement can be expected.

That said, nothing about this year or the coming year can be considered normal.

But players who were already unhappy will still leave. People who were happy but anxious were tempted to leave but will reconsider. But the decisions moving forward are more individual based than larger outside influences forcing player movement.

ECNL should have just accepted the DA’s. Now they still have a thorn in their side.

ECNL should have done whatever they wished to do. They have no obligation to help out non-member clubs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like how you loaded the survey to invite responses only from those who don’t plan to participate so it looks like the numbers are a greater proportion than they are.

Lol. So far the numbers are 3.

In all seriousness the amount of movement will be on par with almost any normal year.

Actually net 1 since one was moving from ECNL to a GA team

Actually reinforcing the point that with the new league stabilizing the previous status quo a bit that more normal player movement can be expected.

That said, nothing about this year or the coming year can be considered normal.

But players who were already unhappy will still leave. People who were happy but anxious were tempted to leave but will reconsider. But the decisions moving forward are more individual based than larger outside influences forcing player movement.

ECNL should have just accepted the DA’s. Now they still have a thorn in their side.

ECNL should have done whatever they wished to do. They have no obligation to help out non-member clubs.

Then you should also accept that parents and players will do as they wish. We are under no obligation to care about your kid or your choice of league, club and team to play with. Please give other parents that same respect.

[Anonymous]

05
FCV
BRYC

[Anonymous]

04
MU
TBD

[Anonymous]

Nobody is heading to Loudoun?

Hahhahahhahahha!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:1) 04
2) McLean -> FCV Yes, going from ECNL to GA

PP, we are also interested in FCV for DD (not 04 though) -- how did you make this happen? Was she already in the process and practicing, etc., before the shutdown?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like how you loaded the survey to invite responses only from those who don’t plan to participate so it looks like the numbers are a greater proportion than they are.

Lol. So far the numbers are 3.

In all seriousness the amount of movement will be on par with almost any normal year.

Actually net 1 since one was moving from ECNL to a GA team

Actually reinforcing the point that with the new league stabilizing the previous status quo a bit that more normal player movement can be expected.

That said, nothing about this year or the coming year can be considered normal.

But players who were already unhappy will still leave. People who were happy but anxious were tempted to leave but will reconsider. But the decisions moving forward are more individual based than larger outside influences forcing player movement.

ECNL should have just accepted the DA’s. Now they still have a thorn in their side.

+1

The rest of the posts here are just noise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:06
MU >
Mclean or possibly Loudoun

Can you clarify between 2007 or 2008 McLean or Loudoun, since the majority of 06 MU is not true 2006 birth year?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:06
MU >
Mclean or possibly Loudoun

Can you clarify between 2007 or 2008 McLean or Loudoun, since the majority of 06 MU is not true 2006 birth year?

Are they playing up or down?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:06
MU >
Mclean or possibly Loudoun

Can you clarify between 2007 or 2008 McLean or Loudoun, since the majority of 06 MU is not true 2006 birth year?

majority? lol.
no.

that team needs all the help they can get. new coach will hopefully help them out

[Anonymous]

05 playup
MU
03 McLean

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:05 playup
MU
03 McLean

this is gold! funniest thing I've read in a VERY long time. thank you for this

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:05 playup
MU
03 McLean

this is gold! funniest thing I've read in a VERY long time. thank you for this

Cheers!! You all are entertaining!

[Anonymous]

Team/Club Change X COVID-19 Pandemic X No Vaccine = CHAOS. Enjoy!!