I'm in STEM and my dc has done Eureka from start through early middle school. (I'm not MCPS parent but in MD) DC finds it straight forward which I think because they have always done it- but slow. I definitely can see how starting it later is more difficult bc it is different, and our school transitioned when they switched to Eureka by grade to avoid that.
Being in STEM, I follow it a bit more closely. I think there are parts that are solid. However, I'm not happy with the gaps in learning compared to DC siblings at same time and the gap seems to grow year on year. I'm not expecting an accelerated approach, just think it leaves some foundational weakness if someone is interested in STEM. STEM colleagues from NY with kids who have done Eureka feel the same way. They are supplementing. I noticed our school started supplementing with non Eureka and wonder if they are noticing it. I know there are bigger issues in the world right now; but with school closures, while I"m ok with other subjects falling behind, I'm looking it as a time to add a little more math. maybe the only non on-line instruction they get for a while.
|