There is actually a bump, even for a non-player. It goes to the overall strength of the applicant and while not as significant a pure athletic direct recruit, it is still a bump worth considering. There was another thread here a few months ago during the Harvard lawsuit that is quite informative. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/135/827019.page#15671114 Basically, as it relates to Harvard (but can be applied to other schools) a "blue-chip" recruit gets an Athletic grade of #1. This is a player of "national, international or Olympic caliber, or one directly recruited by a Harvard coach". Students with an athletic #1 have over an 80% chance of admission. An athletic grade #2, which is a 'leadership role on a club or a secondary school team of regional or state recognition' can give a student a 60% chance of admission. An athletic level 3 is just "active participant in a sport" which has no impact on admissions. That thread has a long discussion on college admissions / academic load if you are curious. |
|
I was one of the other posters that provided time estimates. Our kid loves playing and loves the competition. She is interested in playing in college but not sure that she’d give up a better college just to play soccer. I.e. if she could get into Stanford academically but wouldn’t make the team there she’d still go to Stanford (as an example).
My spouse and I would be more than happy for her to give ECNL up and save the travel time but are also happy to support her and love watching her play. |
+1 |
No judging but it really makes not sense to put in all the effort to be in a DA program if the kid does not want to play in college. How does he even handle all that soccer pressure knowing he will quit? DA kids may or may not make college or pro but the notion they will is what drives them through those 20 degree practices. |