But as a PP said, there is value to getting a STEM degree from a liberal arts school. Not sure you get the distinction |
Disagree. Depends upon the circles you travel in... |
I don't travel in circles. |
What does consulting really mean? I never know what people mean when they say this. |
There is value, sure. But I’ve seen asked many times whether it’s better to get a STEM degree from Virginia Tech or UVA, as one example. A lot of people will say that VT has a stronger recruitment program or better name recognition in that particular field. I don’t think there is a prevailing school of though on it. |
A STEM degree can be a liberal arts degree! You just get it at a school with a liberal arts core curriculum rather than a technical school or large university with specialized departments. I got a chem major at a liberal arts college. It's a liberal arts degree (and has served me well). My husband has a sociology major at a liberal arts college. It's also a liberal arts degree and has served him well. |
That statement doesn't make sense. Many STEM degrees are what Liberal Arts students can choose as a major. Computer science, mathematics, chemistry, biology, physics, neuroscience, data sciences, etc. are all potential majors at schools with Liberal Arts programs. If you were drawing a Venn diagram, they would overlap. |
It means advising other businesses on some aspect of their strategy or operations. There are many large and small/boutique consulting companies. McKinsey may be a familiar one. |
Your semantics are confusing this discussion. The PP is referring to a STEM major. Many people call their STEM major a STEM degree. Doesn't matter where you get it. This discussion is asking about he value of choosing a non-STEM major vs. a STEM major (or maybe a more practical, applied major like business). |
DP: No, they are not. The PP was talking about return on investment of the degrees in the study being discussed--which was return on investment in liberal arts degree. Yes, the liberal arts colleges with engineering degrees/STEM focus perform the best out of that set in terms of lifetime income. But overall liberal arts degrees (STEM majors and otherwise) have a better return on investment than other schools--save for top few schools like Stanford and MIT. |
Disagree. The statement "The return on investment for a STEM degree is about double that of a LA egree, based on the same data set." is what was confusing. Rephrasing to STEM vs. non-STEM is better if that is what was intended. |
| Hey, OP, what did you intend? |
| The article cited shows there can be a very good ROI from LACs, particularly when it is looked at over time. |
| It seems like Liberal Arts just has a bad connotation for some people (although their understanding of it may be flawed). Maybe this is the reason left-leaning democrats now favor the term "progressive" over "liberal". |
|
OP needs to clarify. Do you mean:
- STEM vs non-STEM - Liberal arts colleges vs. research universities (note that the latter can provide liberal arts educations) - Liberal arts degrees vs technical/career-focused degrees (note that the latter does not necessarily mean a vocational school, but can mean something like Georgetown School of Foreign Service, which offers a BSFS degree, in contrast to Georgetown's College of Arts and Sciences, which offers a liberal arts education). To the people who say the "vernacular" dictates that liberal arts educations are non-STEM: no, that just means you're ignorant as to what a liberal arts education is. |