HaHAHa!!! |
Actually his Christian based IVF is just natural cycle IVF that don’t have extra embryos that might count as “abortion” in hardcore anti abortion community. I think natural cycle has other benefits but he might see bigger market in more conservative communities. |
| He was my doctor years ago, but I wouldn't go to him now since I'm a single women. The place he works at now only sees heterosexual, married couples. |
I doubt their clinic can turn away single or gay patients without inviting a lawsuit. That baker case turns on making a cake is free speech but refusing to treat a patient is not free speech. Anyway, not that any single or gay want to go there anyway, unless wanting to make a point. |
| It clearly says on the NEDC website that they treat heterosexual, married couples, with a combined age less than 100. |
Omg lol you have to admit that age restriction is hilarious |
Sure it is, under the broad wording of that case. Doctors and pharmacy technicians have been refusing to provide treatment, contraceptive care, etc for years now. No different from a doctor who won't help with reproductive services for whatever reason. (I'm not saying I agree with this view, only that it is not at all a stretch under current jurisprudence.) |