Anyone else’s clinic not catch that they were having twins??

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:PP did you know Dr. Gordon only practices christian based medicine, he recommends prayer and timed intercourse. Luckily he moved to Knoxville TN where bigoted medicine is okay.


HaHAHa!!!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:PP did you know Dr. Gordon only practices christian based medicine, he recommends prayer and timed intercourse. Luckily he moved to Knoxville TN where bigoted medicine is okay.


Actually his Christian based IVF is just natural cycle IVF that don’t have extra embryos that might count as “abortion” in hardcore anti abortion community. I think natural cycle has other benefits but he might see bigger market in more conservative communities.
Anonymous
He was my doctor years ago, but I wouldn't go to him now since I'm a single women. The place he works at now only sees heterosexual, married couples.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:He was my doctor years ago, but I wouldn't go to him now since I'm a single women. The place he works at now only sees heterosexual, married couples.


I doubt their clinic can turn away single or gay patients without inviting a lawsuit. That baker case turns on making a cake is free speech but refusing to treat a patient is not free speech.

Anyway, not that any single or gay want to go there anyway, unless wanting to make a point.
Anonymous
It clearly says on the NEDC website that they treat heterosexual, married couples, with a combined age less than 100.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It clearly says on the NEDC website that they treat heterosexual, married couples, with a combined age less than 100.


Omg lol you have to admit that age restriction is hilarious
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:He was my doctor years ago, but I wouldn't go to him now since I'm a single women. The place he works at now only sees heterosexual married couples.


I doubt their clinic can turn away single or gay patients without inviting a lawsuit. That baker case turns on making a cake is free speech but refusing to treat a patient is not free speech.

Anyway, not that any single or gay want to go there anyway, unless wanting to make a point.


Sure it is, under the broad wording of that case. Doctors and pharmacy technicians have been refusing to provide treatment, contraceptive care, etc for years now. No different from a doctor who won't help with reproductive services for whatever reason. (I'm not saying I agree with this view, only that it is not at all a stretch under current jurisprudence.)
post reply Forum Index » Infertility Support and Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: