Michael Bloomberg says two members of the British Royals are gay

[Anonymous]

And this matters because....

[Anonymous]

It’s an open secret that Bloomberg himself is gay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I look forward to the day when nobody cares about this.

Dp The day is here for you if you don't care. Why do you care what other people like watching/following. Just skip this thread altogether. Maybe I should say I look forward to people who are not interested in the topic at hand don't say anything like "nobody is interested etc etc" You are above us, we get it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I look forward to the day when nobody cares about this.

Dp The day is here for you if you don't care. Why do you care what other people like watching/following. Just skip this thread altogether. Maybe I should say I look forward to people who are not interested in the topic at hand don't say anything like "nobody is interested etc etc" You are above us, we get it.

New PP. I'm with the original poster. Culturally we are so past hounding people out of the closet. Maybe you should step into the new century and join the rest of us who really don't care and for good reason.

[Anonymous]

What? Someone's... gay?! Oh, the scandal! *faints*

Oh wait, it's 2019 and no one cares. Maybe if he reported something actually juicy like an affair, the public would be interested.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What? Someone's... gay?! Oh, the scandal! *faints*

Oh wait, it's 2019 and no one cares. Maybe if he reported something actually juicy like an affair, the public would be interested.

Or dig deeper into the one who has been credibly accused of sexual abuse of underage, trafficked girls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What? Someone's... gay?! Oh, the scandal! *faints*

Oh wait, it's 2019 and no one cares. Maybe if he reported something actually juicy like an affair, the public would be interested.

They're both married to people of the opposite sex. Kind of weird for gay people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pretty sure that the two are easy to point out -

"The book, created in-house at his firm, was a compilation of quips Bloomberg had supposedly made to staff over the years, and none of them were flattering.

According to Randolph and multiple reports at the time, one of them was: 'The (British) Royal family - what a bunch of misfits - a gay, an architect, that horsey faced lesbian, and a kid who gave up Koo Stark for some fat broad.'"

How are those "quips"?

[Anonymous]

Being gay and in royalty isn't anything new. In fact, it's been around since the ROman Empire.
It was as common as kings have mistresses.

[Anonymous]

Meh. As long as everyone is a consenting adult who cares?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What? Someone's... gay?! Oh, the scandal! *faints*

Oh wait, it's 2019 and no one cares. Maybe if he reported something actually juicy like an affair, the public would be interested.

They're both married to people of the opposite sex. Kind of weird for gay people.

So the cheating part would be juicy. The gay part, meh.

[Anonymous]

What's wrong with being gay? Or horsey-faced, or overweight?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I look forward to the day when nobody cares about this.

Dp The day is here for you if you don't care. Why do you care what other people like watching/following. Just skip this thread altogether. Maybe I should say I look forward to people who are not interested in the topic at hand don't say anything like "nobody is interested etc etc" You are above us, we get it.

And you're a haughty, overreacting bitch, we get it.