Mundo Verde principal resigning

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are starting PK there in the fall and I feel like we won the lottery just in time for everything to go completely off the rails. I am extremely apprehensive about MV at this point, and wondering if we haven't made a tremendous mistake giving up our spot at our happy neighborhood school w/ stable, effective leadership and a teacher that we love. I hope to God the bilingual thing is worth it, and that we haven't just voluntarily signed our kid up for a bad experience.

If you really dislike it, can't you just return to your neighborhood school for K?

Yes, except that if MV doesn't work out, we're leaving DC. We need a bigger place, and I can't buy a $1.XM house without some confidence in what's going to happen w/ the schools- we're in Shaw, and the future for the middle school there is, at best, unclear. All of which is to say, she'll have to go to a 2nd new school in 2 yrs if MV isn't a good fit. And yes, she's young, and yes, she'll recover, but it's a lot to put on a kid.

Between this and the situation w/ Shaw Middle School (the Mayor's office actively stoking racial resentment), I am feeling really spent. All of this uncertainty and upset is pretty avoidable if you just move into Arlington or MoCo. Which I do not want to do, for all the reasons no one on this site wants to, but man, it is a LOT of stress and worry to take on voluntarily.

Please give example of how the mayor’s office is stoking racial resentment? This rhetoric is getting old.

Read this for both sides of the Shaw/Banneker issue https://dcist.com/story/19/05/28/after-fierce-debate-d-c-council-votes-to-swap-sites-for-banneker-high-and-shaw-middle-schools/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s too bad because I heard she did a much better job communicating to the parents than previous leadership.

As to principal turnovers, not sure how much MV has had, but the grass is not always greener on the other side. It’s a huge problem in DCPS because they only have 1 year contracts. It’s not close to enough time to show results under the pressures that they have. Combine this with the dysfunctional DCPS bureaucracy and you get lots of instability. The elementary near us has gone thru 3 principals in 4 years. Then there is the JO Wilson disaster if you have not been following that thread.

Nonsense. Oyster holds onto its principals for quite awhile. Mayra will begin her 6th year as principal in fall 2019.

What is he teacher turnover like? My high performing DCPS has very high teacher turnover. We all assume it is the principal who in DCPS system has too much power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You aren’t going to be happy. Do your 2nd year of free PK and move.

It is a very peculiar-to-DC pathology that the assumption is that the desire for things like high-quality schools and a clear feeder pattern makes one an implacable harpy. What I am asking is not some ridiculous, unattainable standard- I know because I am a product of good public schools, and am happy with the current DCPS school we are enrolled in. We should all expect more of DCPS, and telling parents who are rightfully fed up by the unpredictability and uneven performance of the schools that it is our attitude that is the problem will get future DC kids what it has gotten past DC kids--which is a less-than-they-deserve education.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s too bad because I heard she did a much better job communicating to the parents than previous leadership.

As to principal turnovers, not sure how much MV has had, but the grass is not always greener on the other side. It’s a huge problem in DCPS because they only have 1 year contracts. It’s not close to enough time to show results under the pressures that they have. Combine this with the dysfunctional DCPS bureaucracy and you get lots of instability. The elementary near us has gone thru 3 principals in 4 years. Then there is the JO Wilson disaster if you have not been following that thread.

Nonsense. Oyster holds onto its principals for quite awhile. Mayra will begin her 6th year as principal in fall 2019.

It’s obvious you are in a bubble. Oyster is an outlier then, not the norm. The 4 closest elementary schools to where we live all have had new principals in the last 1-2 years, with short term principals before that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are starting PK there in the fall and I feel like we won the lottery just in time for everything to go completely off the rails. I am extremely apprehensive about MV at this point, and wondering if we haven't made a tremendous mistake giving up our spot at our happy neighborhood school w/ stable, effective leadership and a teacher that we love. I hope to God the bilingual thing is worth it, and that we haven't just voluntarily signed our kid up for a bad experience.

If you really dislike it, can't you just return to your neighborhood school for K?

Yes, except that if MV doesn't work out, we're leaving DC. We need a bigger place, and I can't buy a $1.XM house without some confidence in what's going to happen w/ the schools- we're in Shaw, and the future for the middle school there is, at best, unclear. All of which is to say, she'll have to go to a 2nd new school in 2 yrs if MV isn't a good fit. And yes, she's young, and yes, she'll recover, but it's a lot to put on a kid.

Between this and the situation w/ Shaw Middle School (the Mayor's office actively stoking racial resentment), I am feeling really spent. All of this uncertainty and upset is pretty avoidable if you just move into Arlington or MoCo. Which I do not want to do, for all the reasons no one on this site wants to, but man, it is a LOT of stress and worry to take on voluntarily.

Please give example of how the mayor’s office is stoking racial resentment? This rhetoric is getting old.

Read this for both sides of the Shaw/Banneker issue https://dcist.com/story/19/05/28/after-fierce-debate-d-c-council-votes-to-swap-sites-for-banneker-high-and-shaw-middle-schools/

I attended a "parents outreach" meeting at our (75%+ minority) school where the rep from the Mayor's office said that they interpret the fact that only 19% of in-boundary kids attend the current middle school at Cardozo to be evidence that we do not want to send our kids to school with Black kids, and that therefore there is no demand for a true Shaw Middle School. To say this to a group of parents that CURRENTLY send their kids to a school that is something like 40% Black, 35% Hispanic, 30% White is ridiculous on its face and is a transparently bad-faith argument.

To the poster who added the link above, thank you. I also recommend this piece: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/05/22/dc-mayor-bowser-is-playing-an-old-game-we-beat-it-once-we-can-again/?utm_term=.9708e01fc2a4

And a quote from Councilman Kenyon McDuffie, from tonight's article in the Post:
Council member Kenyan R. McDuffie (D-Ward 5), who supported Banneker’s move to the Shaw site, said in an interview that this was an important vote but that it should not have pitted two communities against each other.

“The stakes are high and should remain high,” he said. “But the complexity of the issue should not have been reduced to the binary choice between whether you support black or brown kids or a gentrifying neighborhood of Shaw.”

I would only add that supporting the gentrifying neighborhood of Shaw IS ALSO supporting black and brown kids. Anyway, the vote has been taken and I hope the Banneker kids get an awesome school out of it, but there was no reason it had to happen at the cost of ripping the heart out of our neighborhood. Pitting the two communities against each other was hugely cynical and corrosive to the long-term health of the city at large.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You aren’t going to be happy. Do your 2nd year of free PK and move.

It is a very peculiar-to-DC pathology that the assumption is that the desire for things like high-quality schools and a clear feeder pattern makes one an implacable harpy. What I am asking is not some ridiculous, unattainable standard- I know because I am a product of good public schools, and am happy with the current DCPS school we are enrolled in. We should all expect more of DCPS, and telling parents who are rightfully fed up by the unpredictability and uneven performance of the schools that it is our attitude that is the problem will get future DC kids what it has gotten past DC kids--which is a less-than-they-deserve education.

You are in a good school you are happy with. So why did you even enter the lottery?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You aren’t going to be happy. Do your 2nd year of free PK and move.

It is a very peculiar-to-DC pathology that the assumption is that the desire for things like high-quality schools and a clear feeder pattern makes one an implacable harpy. What I am asking is not some ridiculous, unattainable standard- I know because I am a product of good public schools, and am happy with the current DCPS school we are enrolled in. We should all expect more of DCPS, and telling parents who are rightfully fed up by the unpredictability and uneven performance of the schools that it is our attitude that is the problem will get future DC kids what it has gotten past DC kids--which is a less-than-they-deserve education.

Is it really a DC thing? Everyone I speak to around DC is completely with you.

I suspect it is conservative trolls on DCUM that hate anything that actually helps other people. They spend their time tearing down DC because they’re jealous of us.

[Anonymous]

^some of the conservative trolls probably even live in DC, or at least the DMV.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We are starting PK there in the fall and I feel like we won the lottery just in time for everything to go completely off the rails. I am extremely apprehensive about MV at this point, and wondering if we haven't made a tremendous mistake giving up our spot at our happy neighborhood school w/ stable, effective leadership and a teacher that we love. I hope to God the bilingual thing is worth it, and that we haven't just voluntarily signed our kid up for a bad experience.

I think I'm having the inverse experience. We are also at a happy neighborhood school in Shaw with wonderful teachers -- maybe the same one? -- and at times felt very lured by the draw of MV, from way people used to talk about it and its proximity to us. Our school loses kids to MV every year. But i did a ton of talking to parents/teachers this year and what I learned really made me nervous about making a huge mistake. we decided not to lottery for MV, ended up getting a great lottery number and a chance at another charter, but in the end decided to stay at our neighborhood school and feel so happy about it. the universe is already telling me it's the right choice -- apparently our amazing current teacher may be looping up with the kids into the next year, so we are guaranteed another good year.

good luck to you -- please consider coming back to the neighborhood school if it doesn't work out for you at MV!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are starting PK there in the fall and I feel like we won the lottery just in time for everything to go completely off the rails. I am extremely apprehensive about MV at this point, and wondering if we haven't made a tremendous mistake giving up our spot at our happy neighborhood school w/ stable, effective leadership and a teacher that we love. I hope to God the bilingual thing is worth it, and that we haven't just voluntarily signed our kid up for a bad experience.

I think I'm having the inverse experience. We are also at a happy neighborhood school in Shaw with wonderful teachers -- maybe the same one? -- and at times felt very lured by the draw of MV, from way people used to talk about it and its proximity to us. Our school loses kids to MV every year. But i did a ton of talking to parents/teachers this year and what I learned really made me nervous about making a huge mistake. we decided not to lottery for MV, ended up getting a great lottery number and a chance at another charter, but in the end decided to stay at our neighborhood school and feel so happy about it. the universe is already telling me it's the right choice -- apparently our amazing current teacher may be looping up with the kids into the next year, so we are guaranteed another good year.

good luck to you -- please consider coming back to the neighborhood school if it doesn't work out for you at MV!

also -- if you are really apprehensive, maybe you can ask the principal if you can re-enroll at the neighborhood school. since you were already there, it's outside of the myschooldc system and may be possible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are starting PK there in the fall and I feel like we won the lottery just in time for everything to go completely off the rails. I am extremely apprehensive about MV at this point, and wondering if we haven't made a tremendous mistake giving up our spot at our happy neighborhood school w/ stable, effective leadership and a teacher that we love. I hope to God the bilingual thing is worth it, and that we haven't just voluntarily signed our kid up for a bad experience.

If you really dislike it, can't you just return to your neighborhood school for K?

Yes, except that if MV doesn't work out, we're leaving DC. We need a bigger place, and I can't buy a $1.XM house without some confidence in what's going to happen w/ the schools- we're in Shaw, and the future for the middle school there is, at best, unclear. All of which is to say, she'll have to go to a 2nd new school in 2 yrs if MV isn't a good fit. And yes, she's young, and yes, she'll recover, but it's a lot to put on a kid.

Between this and the situation w/ Shaw Middle School (the Mayor's office actively stoking racial resentment), I am feeling really spent. All of this uncertainty and upset is pretty avoidable if you just move into Arlington or MoCo. Which I do not want to do, for all the reasons no one on this site wants to, but man, it is a LOT of stress and worry to take on voluntarily.

Please give example of how the mayor’s office is stoking racial resentment? This rhetoric is getting old.

Read this for both sides of the Shaw/Banneker issue https://dcist.com/story/19/05/28/after-fierce-debate-d-c-council-votes-to-swap-sites-for-banneker-high-and-shaw-middle-schools/

I attended a "parents outreach" meeting at our (75%+ minority) school where the rep from the Mayor's office said that they interpret the fact that only 19% of in-boundary kids attend the current middle school at Cardozo to be evidence that we do not want to send our kids to school with Black kids, and that therefore there is no demand for a true Shaw Middle School. To say this to a group of parents that CURRENTLY send their kids to a school that is something like 40% Black, 35% Hispanic, 30% White is ridiculous on its face and is a transparently bad-faith argument.

To the poster who added the link above, thank you. I also recommend this piece: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/05/22/dc-mayor-bowser-is-playing-an-old-game-we-beat-it-once-we-can-again/?utm_term=.9708e01fc2a4

And a quote from Councilman Kenyon McDuffie, from tonight's article in the Post:
Council member Kenyan R. McDuffie (D-Ward 5), who supported Banneker’s move to the Shaw site, said in an interview that this was an important vote but that it should not have pitted two communities against each other.

“The stakes are high and should remain high,” he said. “But the complexity of the issue should not have been reduced to the binary choice between whether you support black or brown kids or a gentrifying neighborhood of Shaw.”

I would only add that supporting the gentrifying neighborhood of Shaw IS ALSO supporting black and brown kids. Anyway, the vote has been taken and I hope the Banneker kids get an awesome school out of it, but there was no reason it had to happen at the cost of ripping the heart out of our neighborhood. Pitting the two communities against each other was hugely cynical and corrosive to the long-term health of the city at large.

Still don’t see where her office stoked racial resentment. One’s interpretation doesn’t equal what’s PP said. You’re no better than what she’s being accused of.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are starting PK there in the fall and I feel like we won the lottery just in time for everything to go completely off the rails. I am extremely apprehensive about MV at this point, and wondering if we haven't made a tremendous mistake giving up our spot at our happy neighborhood school w/ stable, effective leadership and a teacher that we love. I hope to God the bilingual thing is worth it, and that we haven't just voluntarily signed our kid up for a bad experience.

If you really dislike it, can't you just return to your neighborhood school for K?

Yes, except that if MV doesn't work out, we're leaving DC. We need a bigger place, and I can't buy a $1.XM house without some confidence in what's going to happen w/ the schools- we're in Shaw, and the future for the middle school there is, at best, unclear. All of which is to say, she'll have to go to a 2nd new school in 2 yrs if MV isn't a good fit. And yes, she's young, and yes, she'll recover, but it's a lot to put on a kid.

Between this and the situation w/ Shaw Middle School (the Mayor's office actively stoking racial resentment), I am feeling really spent. All of this uncertainty and upset is pretty avoidable if you just move into Arlington or MoCo. Which I do not want to do, for all the reasons no one on this site wants to, but man, it is a LOT of stress and worry to take on voluntarily.

Please give example of how the mayor’s office is stoking racial resentment? This rhetoric is getting old.

Read this for both sides of the Shaw/Banneker issue https://dcist.com/story/19/05/28/after-fierce-debate-d-c-council-votes-to-swap-sites-for-banneker-high-and-shaw-middle-schools/

I attended a "parents outreach" meeting at our (75%+ minority) school where the rep from the Mayor's office said that they interpret the fact that only 19% of in-boundary kids attend the current middle school at Cardozo to be evidence that we do not want to send our kids to school with Black kids, and that therefore there is no demand for a true Shaw Middle School. To say this to a group of parents that CURRENTLY send their kids to a school that is something like 40% Black, 35% Hispanic, 30% White is ridiculous on its face and is a transparently bad-faith argument.

To the poster who added the link above, thank you. I also recommend this piece: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/05/22/dc-mayor-bowser-is-playing-an-old-game-we-beat-it-once-we-can-again/?utm_term=.9708e01fc2a4

And a quote from Councilman Kenyon McDuffie, from tonight's article in the Post:
Council member Kenyan R. McDuffie (D-Ward 5), who supported Banneker’s move to the Shaw site, said in an interview that this was an important vote but that it should not have pitted two communities against each other.

“The stakes are high and should remain high,” he said. “But the complexity of the issue should not have been reduced to the binary choice between whether you support black or brown kids or a gentrifying neighborhood of Shaw.”

I would only add that supporting the gentrifying neighborhood of Shaw IS ALSO supporting black and brown kids. Anyway, the vote has been taken and I hope the Banneker kids get an awesome school out of it, but there was no reason it had to happen at the cost of ripping the heart out of our neighborhood. Pitting the two communities against each other was hugely cynical and corrosive to the long-term health of the city at large.

Still don’t see where her office stoked racial resentment. One’s interpretation doesn’t equal what’s PP said. You’re no better than what she’s being accused of.

DP here. I'm not giving an opinion myself, but here's yet another article, from Jonetta Rose Barras:

https://thedcline.org/2019/05/23/jonetta-rose-barras-mayor-bowser-the-gentrification-bogeyman-and-shaw-middle-school/

Mayor Bowser, the gentrification bogeyman and Shaw Middle School

The attempts by Mayor Muriel Bowser and others to link gentrification to the critical debate over whether to reopen Shaw Middle School at its former Rhode Island Avenue NW site or instead relocate Banneker Academic High School there ignores residents’ historic and unrealized dreams.


Photo by Bruce McNeil
It also raises two important questions: Don’t white parents or newly arrived DC families have the right to demand good schools in their neighborhood? Should the benefits of quality education be expected to accrue only to families of color or native Washingtonians, or residents of certain neighborhoods?

Bowser is becoming almost as expert as the man in the White House at creating bogeymen that divide residents or that misdirect important public policy conversations. Her motivation appears to be winning the game or at least gaining political leverage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are starting PK there in the fall and I feel like we won the lottery just in time for everything to go completely off the rails. I am extremely apprehensive about MV at this point, and wondering if we haven't made a tremendous mistake giving up our spot at our happy neighborhood school w/ stable, effective leadership and a teacher that we love. I hope to God the bilingual thing is worth it, and that we haven't just voluntarily signed our kid up for a bad experience.

If you really dislike it, can't you just return to your neighborhood school for K?

Yes, except that if MV doesn't work out, we're leaving DC. We need a bigger place, and I can't buy a $1.XM house without some confidence in what's going to happen w/ the schools- we're in Shaw, and the future for the middle school there is, at best, unclear. All of which is to say, she'll have to go to a 2nd new school in 2 yrs if MV isn't a good fit. And yes, she's young, and yes, she'll recover, but it's a lot to put on a kid.

Between this and the situation w/ Shaw Middle School (the Mayor's office actively stoking racial resentment), I am feeling really spent. All of this uncertainty and upset is pretty avoidable if you just move into Arlington or MoCo. Which I do not want to do, for all the reasons no one on this site wants to, but man, it is a LOT of stress and worry to take on voluntarily.

Please give example of how the mayor’s office is stoking racial resentment? This rhetoric is getting old.

Read this for both sides of the Shaw/Banneker issue https://dcist.com/story/19/05/28/after-fierce-debate-d-c-council-votes-to-swap-sites-for-banneker-high-and-shaw-middle-schools/

I attended a "parents outreach" meeting at our (75%+ minority) school where the rep from the Mayor's office said that they interpret the fact that only 19% of in-boundary kids attend the current middle school at Cardozo to be evidence that we do not want to send our kids to school with Black kids, and that therefore there is no demand for a true Shaw Middle School. To say this to a group of parents that CURRENTLY send their kids to a school that is something like 40% Black, 35% Hispanic, 30% White is ridiculous on its face and is a transparently bad-faith argument.

To the poster who added the link above, thank you. I also recommend this piece: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/05/22/dc-mayor-bowser-is-playing-an-old-game-we-beat-it-once-we-can-again/?utm_term=.9708e01fc2a4

And a quote from Councilman Kenyon McDuffie, from tonight's article in the Post:
Council member Kenyan R. McDuffie (D-Ward 5), who supported Banneker’s move to the Shaw site, said in an interview that this was an important vote but that it should not have pitted two communities against each other.

“The stakes are high and should remain high,” he said. “But the complexity of the issue should not have been reduced to the binary choice between whether you support black or brown kids or a gentrifying neighborhood of Shaw.”

I would only add that supporting the gentrifying neighborhood of Shaw IS ALSO supporting black and brown kids. Anyway, the vote has been taken and I hope the Banneker kids get an awesome school out of it, but there was no reason it had to happen at the cost of ripping the heart out of our neighborhood. Pitting the two communities against each other was hugely cynical and corrosive to the long-term health of the city at large.

Still don’t see where her office stoked racial resentment. One’s interpretation doesn’t equal what’s PP said. You’re no better than what she’s being accused of.

DP: it's clear that that rep was stoking racial tensions -- exactly the same way you are.

[Anonymous]

Hey PP, thank you for sharing your concerns about your DCPS vs. MV. We are likely going to have the same choice this summer and I'm feeling the same way. And I'm super disappointed about what happened yesterday at the Council. Dysfunctional puts it mildly. It's a really tough time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are starting PK there in the fall and I feel like we won the lottery just in time for everything to go completely off the rails. I am extremely apprehensive about MV at this point, and wondering if we haven't made a tremendous mistake giving up our spot at our happy neighborhood school w/ stable, effective leadership and a teacher that we love. I hope to God the bilingual thing is worth it, and that we haven't just voluntarily signed our kid up for a bad experience.

If you really dislike it, can't you just return to your neighborhood school for K?

Yes, except that if MV doesn't work out, we're leaving DC. We need a bigger place, and I can't buy a $1.XM house without some confidence in what's going to happen w/ the schools- we're in Shaw, and the future for the middle school there is, at best, unclear. All of which is to say, she'll have to go to a 2nd new school in 2 yrs if MV isn't a good fit. And yes, she's young, and yes, she'll recover, but it's a lot to put on a kid.

Between this and the situation w/ Shaw Middle School (the Mayor's office actively stoking racial resentment), I am feeling really spent. All of this uncertainty and upset is pretty avoidable if you just move into Arlington or MoCo. Which I do not want to do, for all the reasons no one on this site wants to, but man, it is a LOT of stress and worry to take on voluntarily.

Please give example of how the mayor’s office is stoking racial resentment? This rhetoric is getting old.

Read this for both sides of the Shaw/Banneker issue https://dcist.com/story/19/05/28/after-fierce-debate-d-c-council-votes-to-swap-sites-for-banneker-high-and-shaw-middle-schools/

I attended a "parents outreach" meeting at our (75%+ minority) school where the rep from the Mayor's office said that they interpret the fact that only 19% of in-boundary kids attend the current middle school at Cardozo to be evidence that we do not want to send our kids to school with Black kids, and that therefore there is no demand for a true Shaw Middle School. To say this to a group of parents that CURRENTLY send their kids to a school that is something like 40% Black, 35% Hispanic, 30% White is ridiculous on its face and is a transparently bad-faith argument.

To the poster who added the link above, thank you. I also recommend this piece: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/05/22/dc-mayor-bowser-is-playing-an-old-game-we-beat-it-once-we-can-again/?utm_term=.9708e01fc2a4

And a quote from Councilman Kenyon McDuffie, from tonight's article in the Post:
Council member Kenyan R. McDuffie (D-Ward 5), who supported Banneker’s move to the Shaw site, said in an interview that this was an important vote but that it should not have pitted two communities against each other.

“The stakes are high and should remain high,” he said. “But the complexity of the issue should not have been reduced to the binary choice between whether you support black or brown kids or a gentrifying neighborhood of Shaw.”

I would only add that supporting the gentrifying neighborhood of Shaw IS ALSO supporting black and brown kids. Anyway, the vote has been taken and I hope the Banneker kids get an awesome school out of it, but there was no reason it had to happen at the cost of ripping the heart out of our neighborhood. Pitting the two communities against each other was hugely cynical and corrosive to the long-term health of the city at large.

Still don’t see where her office stoked racial resentment. One’s interpretation doesn’t equal what’s PP said. You’re no better than what she’s being accused of.

DP: it's clear that that rep was stoking racial tensions -- exactly the same way you are.

This sounds a lot like conservative projection to me: accuse others of what you’re guilty of. And your reply contains no content, just a false accusation.

I think the three articles now posted, all which detail how Bowser is stoking racial tensions for political gain, stand for themselves. If you want to argue against them, you’re going to need to bring some facts, not just conservative-like content-free projection.