Trump lies that Stacey Abrams is "not qualified" in WH speech

[Anonymous]

He’s a liar and a thief. Stacey Abrams is a million times more qualified to lead than Trump can ever hope to be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is such a horrible President. I can't imagine our country will ever recover from the mess he, the GOP, and Newt have inflicted on us.

LOL. I thought the same thing about Obama. The guy with a pen and a phone. Fortunately, we elected a guy with a huge eraser.
Things will be fine.

Touché - and well said!

No, Trump is unique and unprecedented. He hasn’t started a pointless war yet however.

[Anonymous]

When it comes to criticizing for lack of qualifications, Trump doesn't have a leg to stand on. Period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In his "speech" about immigration Trump veers into deriding Stacey Abrams as "not qualified by any stretch of the imagination." Stacey is a Yale-graduated lawyer. Just last week he praised the GOP Gov candidate as immensely qualified because of his Ivvy degree and today he considers the same degree for a black woman leader worthless. There must be some difference he sees between these two individuals. I wonder what it is.

We all know what he meant. He is a horrible racist. Hopefully Kemp hasn't suppressed so many black votes in Georgia that Abrams can't win this.

+1
He’s not just racist, he’s also sexist. I, too, hope that Kemp and the GOP haven’t suppressed so much that they don’t get to win by default.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is such a horrible President. I can't imagine our country will ever recover from the mess he, the GOP, and Newt have inflicted on us.

LOL. I thought the same thing about Obama. The guy with a pen and a phone. Fortunately, we elected a guy with a huge eraser.
Things will be fine.

No one was sending GOP pipe bombs,

[Anonymous]

Stacy Abrams has ethics and integrity, which is something the GOP needs more of!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Huh. Kind of the way liberals will praise any woman running as a Democrat, but deride any woman daring to run as a Republican?

And the way liberals will call voters “racists” and/or “sexists” if they don’t vote for the liberal woman or POC?

Liberals are all about feminism - but ONLY if the woman in question is a fellow liberal. Otherwise, she’s “an unqualified idiot,” in addition to far more colorful terms - “feckless c**t” comes to mind.
Hypocrites.

Yes, exactly like that. Imagine.

What are you going on about? We are talking about the president of the US, not your imaginary “liberal” friends.

Liberals on DCUM know exactly what I’m talking about, though they will never admit it.

+1 Just yesterday, a poster referred to DeSantis as not more than a dishmop. He has an undergrad degree from Yale and a law degree from Harvard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He’s a liar and a thief. Stacey Abrams is a million times more qualified to lead than Trump can ever hope to be.

I live in Georgia and think Stacey Abrams is immensely qualified, extremely likeable, and highly intelligent. The race is tight, tight, tight. I wish she were a little less liberal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stacy Abrams has ethics and integrity, which is something the GOP needs more of!

Actually, BOTH parties could benefit from more candidates with her ethics, candidness, and integrity. I really appreciated her remarks in conversing with Megan McCain.

[Anonymous]

In April 2018, Abrams wrote an op-ed for Fortune revealing that she owes $50,000 in back taxes and holds $170,000 in credit card and student loan debt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is such a horrible President. I can't imagine our country will ever recover from the mess he, the GOP, and Newt have inflicted on us.

LOL. I thought the same thing about Obama. The guy with a pen and a phone. Fortunately, we elected a guy with a huge eraser.
Things will be fine.

Oh yes. LOL! 13 people are dead behind his rhetoric. So funny. I'm still laughing. If he is who you praise as a President, you get what you deserve.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In April 2018, Abrams wrote an op-ed for Fortune revealing that she owes $50,000 in back taxes and holds $170,000 in credit card and student loan debt

And? She also said she was taking care of her parents. Not everyone can leave their kids $400 million.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Huh. Kind of the way liberals will praise any woman running as a Democrat, but deride any woman daring to run as a Republican?

And the way liberals will call voters “racists” and/or “sexists” if they don’t vote for the liberal woman or POC?

Liberals are all about feminism - but ONLY if the woman in question is a fellow liberal. Otherwise, she’s “an unqualified idiot,” in addition to far more colorful terms - “feckless c**t” comes to mind.
Hypocrites.

Yes, exactly like that. Imagine.

What are you going on about? We are talking about the president of the US, not your imaginary “liberal” friends.

Liberals on DCUM know exactly what I’m talking about, though they will never admit it.

+1 Just yesterday, a poster referred to DeSantis as not more than a dishmop. He has an undergrad degree from Yale and a law degree from Harvard.

That certainly was not based on his degrees. It was based on him being a jerk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In April 2018, Abrams wrote an op-ed for Fortune revealing that she owes $50,000 in back taxes and holds $170,000 in credit card and student loan debt

If tax and debt issues were disqualifying we wouldn’t have the President you clearly love. Next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In his "speech" about immigration Trump veers into deriding Stacey Abrams as "not qualified by any stretch of the imagination." Stacey is a Yale-graduated lawyer. Just last week he praised the GOP Gov candidate as immensely qualified because of his Ivvy degree and today he considers the same degree for a black woman leader worthless. There must be some difference he sees between these two individuals. I wonder what it is.

One is Democrat. And, one is Republican.
Yes, OP, it is as simple as that. Quit looking for a race angle where none exists.

Why do you think he endorses John James over Debbie Stabenow? Which one is a POC?

Exactly. But you know - if they can’t blame everything on racism, then they have no talking points.

True. Liberals care about and defend:

....women, if they are liberal
....POC, if they are liberal
....Jews, if they are liberal
....low-income workers, if they are liberal

Otherwise, they are treated to the vile: racist! A-hole! Traitor! White trash!

You clearly live in a Trump bubble. Don't ever talk about liberals living in bubbles. You guys take the cake. I always wonder who these "liberals" are that you seem to worship.