+1 I can count on one hand the # of kids I've seen with both that level of genetics + singular love for the ball ... Parents are reluctant to really accept how average their "elite" ECNLer is |
|
|
No one’s belittling other people’s kids fool. You’re belittling the poster and asking them to throw out personal info on here, which isn’t really needed to get the point they’re trying to make. |
|
Seriously,without nitpicking about who is elite and what the end game is, does anyone has any ideas for a non-elite but very competent player who loves soccer? For kids who don't live and breathe soccer every moment but who are willing to put in hours a week to get better just because they want to improve? Where do kids who love to train go to play at a reasonable level with other like minded players without having to travel all over or serve as pawns in a club's march toward youth soccer domination? The team doesn't have to be the best, just decent. preferably with coaches committed to the players on the team (i.e. not shopping for players from other clubs to make the team better/win more). What are the options?
Is anyone starting a movement? |
Middle/High school soccer. |
No movement needs to be started, it is called NCSL, ODSL or certain divisions of EDP. NPL and CCL certainly have some out of town games but they are fine options depending on your threshold. |
Try NCSL, maybe a medium to smaller club. It really will come down to the coach, regardless of your player’s level. |
|
|
^^
The problem is that you think PPs are belittling players. That's where you stepped into it. Agree with PP that the folks with the wallets are to blame, not the players nor the clubs. Stop paying. |
It exists. Just keep looking. I doubt many will post personal info/stories, but there are other options besides HS. |
|
Sure, I have a solution. We've talked about this issue in many different threads, but probably in the most depth here: http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/748637.page
My proposed solution is that ECNL, NPL, and CCL fold, either because their leadership realizes the harm that these leagues cause to parents and kids (through player pool dilution, needless expenditures of cash, and needless travel) or because parents pressure clubs to drop out of them. Then, we have one main local travel league, which could be NCSL or EDP, that tries to minimize travel at the youngest ages, one Region 1 league that starts somewhere in the U12 or U13 age range and accepts the best teams from the the local league (this will change each season) and one National League that you can qualify for the same way as the current USYSA National League. DA should continue more or less in it's current form for those who are very serious and are ok with skipping high school. Micro local leagues like ODSL, OBSL, or whatever can continue to exist if clubs have travel teams that they don't think are ready for the NCSL or EDP main local league, and we should all work to volunteer to make all the local rec leagues stronger and cheaper. How we get there is a different matter, but that's my vision. |
I'm the second poster and I did not say my kids are 'very elite' or 'even elite'. They are decent. |
A bit condescending don't you think? The truth is that there are very good reasons for seeking a high level of play for one's child. You know what one of the best reasons is? Because the child himself asks for it. The difference in levels of play is even more obvious to the players than it is to us watching. They can feel it immediately when they step onto the field, even in practice. The ones who are good enough to hang at a higher level, usually want to play there because they know that's what will make them better. Believe it or not, most of the kids at that level are extremely self-motivated. I'm not saying I disagree completely with the OP though. Below the DA (boys) and ENCL/DA (girls) levels, it makes little sense to travel on a regular basis for competitive games. Away trips for tournaments once or twice a year can be a fun experience for the kids, but it doesn't have to be crazy. At that level I think the OP is right - there are more than enough strong teams in and around the DMV to give each other an appropriate level of competition. It makes no sense to have McLean and BRYC's boys teams travel to North and South Carolina, while Pipeline and SAC teams are driving to NJ & PA, when they could all just play each other along with all of the other clubs mentioned. If I were to draw it up from scratch, here's how I would do it: 1) Leave the boys DA as is. There is a need for it. It consolidates talent in very few clubs: 3-4 in this area instead of 20. This raises the day-to-day training environment for those players. When everyone on the team is outstanding, no one can relax or get complacent. It makes a difference. The trade-off to that talent consolidation though, is that those teams can no longer get much meaningful competition without traveling out of the area. DCU, BSC and Armour can't just play each other every weekend for a 10 month season, and there only so many 9-2, 6-0 and 6-1 games that are productive. There is a benefit to those teams traveling to play against the likes of NY Red Bulls, Philly Union, and PDA. 2) Disband the ECNL and expand the girls DA. There is no real need for two competing national leagues. All it does is dilute talent. The federation screwed this up when they initially launched the DA by making it only for boys. Leave it up to the clubs if they want to let their players play HS ball or not. That's not a hill worth dying on. Most probably won't, but there will be exceptions, and it will be OK (Malory Pugh). 3) Below that level, each region should have a single league, with divisions based on pro/rel, and no geographic overlap between leagues. Put an end to leagues competing in the same geographic area for teams at the same level, and you will solve the insane travel problem. Just for fun, there could be post-season inter-regional competitions between teams of similar levels from the different geographic leagues, culminating in a "national championship" tournament for the best teams. The proceeds from the inter-regional tournaments should be used to fund travel to the national championship tournaments for those teams who qualify. Many of you probably read all that and think it's impossible, but it's really not. The existing youth organizations (AYSO, USYSA and US Club) all fall under the umbrella of the US Soccer Federation. As we've seen in recent years, the federation can mandate change when it wants to (birth year, game format per age group, field dimensions). It just lacks the will. |
I don't disagree. I think if you can keep your kid playing competitively and getting enough challenge until they are age 14. Hold off on DA and you will have less years of serious driving up and down the coast and a far. Prior to U15 there is no need for DA if you don't want to drive. That is a 14 year old. But, you will need to consider it by the time they are U15. |