Cornell or Northwestern?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Northwestern is mostly annoying pre-professional strivers who couldn't get into an Ivy (even Cornell!).

Cornell is clean cut CA-NY-NJ legacy kids and type-A boarding school kids and Asian grinds pursuing STEM.

Without question Big Red is a better undergrad experience.

duke is worse than nw in that regard - annoying kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Northwestern is mostly annoying pre-professional strivers who couldn't get into an Ivy (even Cornell!).

Cornell is clean cut CA-NY-NJ legacy kids and type-A boarding school kids and Asian grinds pursuing STEM.

Without question Big Red is a better undergrad experience.

duke is worse than nw in that regard - annoying kids.

If you don’t have enough experience to know that it is NU and not NW, you probably don’t have enough experience to make generalizations about the school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Northwestern undergrad is meh.

Low Ivy is still an Ivy.

So what? Ivy is just a sport conference

yeah keep telling yourself that the ivy league is just a sports conference. You might actually conceive yourself one day...as for convincing the rest of us out there, good luck. The ivy league is so much more than just a sports conference in the eyes of the public. It is synonymous with elite higher education and it is a really strong brand.

[Anonymous]

I suspect those thoughts are born our of insecurity. No on in their right mind would say that and have any credibility whatsoever. Ivy League is a football conference after all. It's been stated by many many who know, that Cornell is extremely difficult, with a heavier workload than almost all of the Ivies by a good margin mostly bc of the way the school's is structured and its pre-professional bent. So next time you attempt to insult a school, you really ought to have your facts straight lest you embarrass yourself.

[Anonymous]

In my hood SUNY Ithaca gets no respect lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I suspect those thoughts are born our of insecurity. No on in their right mind would say that and have any credibility whatsoever. Ivy League is a football conference after all. It's been stated by many many who know, that Cornell is extremely difficult, with a heavier workload than almost all of the Ivies by a good margin mostly bc of the way the school's is structured and its pre-professional bent. So next time you attempt to insult a school, you really ought to have your facts straight lest you embarrass yourself.

It's an athletic conference, not a football conference.....dummy.

[Anonymous]

NU is fantastic with a very strong undergraduate experience. I'd suggest you visit both.

[Anonymous]

ruth bader ginsburg > megyn markle and the dorks on ESPN

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No meaningful difference in prestige.

Both are cold. Really it comes down to one thing: do you want to be near a big city, or far from a big city?

This.

Not sure but my impression is that Northwestern is more of a party school than Cornell.

[Anonymous]

Cornell. Its ivy tag still counts for something, even it is the least shiny of the ivy tags.

[Anonymous]

cornell is more prestigious, probably better for most majors as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:ruth bader ginsburg > megyn markle and the dorks on ESPN

Stephen Colbert > Ann Coulter

See how dumb that mechanism is?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ruth bader ginsburg > megyn markle and the dorks on ESPN

Stephen Colbert > Ann Coulter

See how dumb that mechanism is?

Bill Maher > Stephen Colbert

No, I don't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ruth bader ginsburg > megyn markle and the dorks on ESPN

Stephen Colbert > Ann Coulter

See how dumb that mechanism is?

Bill Maher > Stephen Colbert

No, I don't.[/quote
Ew. Bill Maher is gross and racist. No thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ruth bader ginsburg > megyn markle and the dorks on ESPN

Stephen Colbert > Ann Coulter

See how dumb that mechanism is?

Bill Maher > Stephen Colbert

No, I don't.[/quote
Ew. Bill Maher is gross and racist. No thank you.

How is he racist? I think he’s smart and unafraid to speak his mind.