Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OK, well, skipping over the person who thinks we're awful people.....
I listened to the promo for the show today and found it off-putting. For one thing, she referred to Went as "a major character in the story." Or, you know, a murderer in a horrific case. Or to be more accurate, a suspected murderer. He's not a character in a story.
I listen to a fair amount of true crime podcasts. I think there is a lot to learn from true crime and the best podcasts manage to tell a coherent, compelling story that not only bears witness to a horrible crime, but also illustrates larger points in society. I'm thinking of who killed Alberta Williams, about an area in Canada where many many indigenous women have been found murdered. Or even Serial season 1 which may have been a wrongful conviction, or Up and Vanished which may have brought enough attention to a cold case to actually solve the case. Or Accused, which focused on false confessions, and the lack of progress in a cold case once the initial suspect was (rightly) found not guilty of murder, despite his (false) confession.
I think most of the better true crime podcasts come from existing media outlets, like Alberta Williams, or Breakdown from the Atlantic Journal Constitution, Accused from a Cincinnati newspaper, etc.
In fact, I just started listening to Dirty John today and that was done by the LA Times, I think. The bottom line is writing is what really distinguishes a good podcast. And the writing on the promo was.....not good. It sounded like Sarah Fraser just prattling on about interesting characters. Not a compelling, serious look into an open investigation.
Breakdown from the Atlanta Journal Constitution is one of the few I can think of that did the podcast before (and during) the trail (for season 2). I think it is a very tricky, nuanced path to walk before the investigation is concluded and the trial is over. Based on the promo, I am skeptical of the podcast. But I will listen because i think this is an important case and needs more attention.
I thought it was weird the way that the host was talking about Wint as if there was a possibility he wasn't involved?? I mean he clearly was.
The other thing I thought was interesting was how the host was saying there were things that were "off" about the family. I don't know what that could be referring to because they seemed like a normal family, albeit very very wealthy.