CPS isn't going to do anything about a teacher. They investigate family situations and they aren't going to give a rat's ass about some post on some crappy gossip website. Maybe if you called them because your child complained about inappropriate touching. Or even if your child mentioned a classmate had a complaint, but a random post online? NO. |
| OP, did YOU post the comment about the teacher being a pedophile? It's starting to feel that way. |
CPS is going to need an actual person with an actual complaint. I don't think google fills that role. |
Lol! Your definition of casual is not the same as mine. You were straight up digging for information. Just own it. Do you really think the teachers at your snowflakes school haven't been thouroughly vetted? |
FFS. That isn't how cps works. OP, ignore this moron |
| I'm in shock that OP thinks the schools use google to do background checks. In reality, they go through the FBI. Is that thorough enough for you? |
+1 To those of you criticizing OP, how would you react if you saw something damning about the person who changes their diaper and spends most of the day of them? |
Their/them = your children. Or, your "snowflakes" as an enlightened PP said. |
So destroy a person's life based on google search and the call whoopsie if you are wrong? Lemme guess, you also think men should be kicked out of college simply based on a sexual assault accusations, not actual evidence. |
This is not a thread about Betsy DeVos and college rape. This is about some person anonymously spreading trash about this teacher on a local forum. There is no actual accuser here who can be contacted by authorities. It could have been posted by someone who has never even met this teacher. I've met more than one person who thinks that every male teacher is a pedophile because why else would they want to be around children. If there was a real accusation, the man would not be in a classroom. Period. |
We are in agreement pp. I think it is horrendous the top pp is so cavalier about possibly destroying a person's life simply based on a google search. |
How would you not know your child's teacher? |
What on earth is your basis for saying this? In most states, employers can consider almost any information, and can make a decision based on any criteria that is not discriminatory or retaliatory (based upon a protected class such as race, religion, prior invocation of rights under a statute, etc.). Some states prohibit employers from making decisions based upon prior criminal arrest or conviction, unless the conviction is related to the job requirements. But that's not what this is, and not what OP is asking. She's just asking whether she should bring it to the employer's attention so that they can do an investigation. If the teacher doesn't already know about this site, he or she should so he or she can take appropriate action to clear his or her name. If the teacher already knows about it, it's likely the school already does, and they've already decided that it's groundless. I've google searched every single nanny that I've ever hired. One applicant I did not hire because I found her posting on sites for "swingers." |
They don't actually go through the FBI, or even do an extensive background check. They run fingerprints, that's about it. |
|
I would not give any consideration to something found on a gossip site.
This is what happens when you "casually google" and then believe unreliable sites. |