DC was in the same position. Applied EA to her fave and was admitted. It was a tough decision in real time, but my take was that the outcome I most wanted to avoid was her not getting her best shot at the school she wanted most. Not admitted to any top tier would have been a better outcome than admitted only to legacy. That said, DC really hated the idea of legacy advantage and if that weren't in the mix, there might have been a different EA choice. Double legacy school was her #2 choice. |
I think pp meant the 3% of the 7.9% were admitted early. And 4.9% RD. So about 40% ED? |
No I am not mistaken. Check their website yourself. I read this only today. Cannot link from my iphone |
Yes this |
| University of Pennsylvania had the most competitive applications this year out of ALL US colleges |
Judging by the quality of your writing .... |
Why? That was the joke of the Ivies not that long ago. |
What does the bolded even mean? |
| If you think these schools are equally "perfect", then there is more work to be done to identify best fit. |
Have your child apply early to the University that they most want to attend. Simple as that. Our son loved Harvard, it was his top choice, but he was encouraged by his college counselor to apply to Stanford or Yale instead, as a much larger number of his classmates were applying EA to Harvard than to Stanford or Yale in his year. He politely declined that advice, applied EA to his first choice, and was admitted early to Harvard. Whatever happens you will not regret being true to your heart with your EA submission. |
40% ED = binding or just early notification? |
|
^^ you can read all about it here
http://www.thedp.com/article/2017/03/penn-acceptance-rate-release |
Not for ED. That school has clear bias to certain students. |
I saw one wealthy private school in New York had 8 ED admissions. 8 from a tiny school. Ridiculous. |
|
Well, might I suggest you have your kid read a bit, reflect a bit, and then pick the one that fits best?
They really are quite different. |