What the hell just happened with Steven Miller???

[Anonymous]

He's an ahole.

[Anonymous]

I thought Miller was eloquent and right on target, refuting Acosta and Thrush all along the way with their "petty" and "narrow" questions and continued interruptions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought Miller was eloquent and right on target, refuting Acosta and Thrush all along the way with their "petty" and "narrow" questions and continued interruptions.

What? You need to watch that again. He came off as an arrogant, uninformed, ideaological fool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought Miller was eloquent and right on target, refuting Acosta and Thrush all along the way with their "petty" and "narrow" questions and continued interruptions.

You are high or mentally impaired

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought Miller was eloquent and right on target, refuting Acosta and Thrush all along the way with their "petty" and "narrow" questions and continued interruptions.

Why are petty and narrow on quotes? Do you mean something else? Perhaps YOU need to learn the English language better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought Miller was eloquent and right on target, refuting Acosta and Thrush all along the way with their "petty" and "narrow" questions and continued interruptions.

Only Steven Miller himself could think that.

Hi Steve. Been midnight tokin' again?

[Anonymous]

can someone pls summarize for those of us who didn't see it??????

[Anonymous]

How is that dude only 31?

[Anonymous]

Jim, you ignorant slut!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:can someone pls summarize for those of us who didn't see it??????

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-J4FvxtD9I

[Anonymous]

Miller should not be talking with the press--but, if Acosta keeps up the grandstanding, then cameras should go dark again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Miller should not be talking with the press--but, if Acosta keeps up the grandstanding, then cameras should go dark again.

You know democracy is dying when asking a question is considered grandstanding and cause for someone to suggest everyone should be kept in the dark.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought Miller was eloquent and right on target, refuting Acosta and Thrush all along the way with their "petty" and "narrow" questions and continued interruptions.

Mrs. Miller, I hardly think you are in a position of impartial evaluation of Stephen's performance, but I am sure his boss was super happy with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Miller should not be talking with the press--but, if Acosta keeps up the grandstanding, then cameras should go dark again.

By way of background, the policy office usually puts out a document with statistics etc that explain the policy they are to present at the briefing. That didn't happen here, so Mr. Acosta was asking for information that the media and public usually get on background. If that is grandstanding in your mind, then you simply don't understand how the White House or media are supposed to work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought Miller was eloquent and right on target, refuting Acosta and Thrush all along the way with their "petty" and "narrow" questions and continued interruptions.

Mrs. Miller, I hardly think you are in a position of impartial evaluation of Stephen's performance, but I am sure his boss was super happy with it.

Bolded is true. Miller was speaking the absolute truth when he said at the end, "I think that was exactly what we were hoping would happen."