Forum Index
»
Beauty and Fashion
My sister is a natural brunette. She has been lightening her hair for years (not blonde, but very tasteful highlights -- I don't think most people would have recognized them as highlights), but stopped in the last year or two and has actually gone back to her natural shade, if not darker. She is in her 50's and looks better now than she has in years. So going lighter is not always the right move. |
|
I gave the "aging mom next to teen daughter" example. So you can see what look the mom was going for, but sometimes, it just doesn't look like she thinks it might... I am all for longer hair on women. But really, sometimes it just looks like someone is trying too hard. Sometimes we have to darken it up just a bit to not look *washed out* (complexion chnages). But it certainly beats the man haircut
|
| I had light blond hair until I was in my mid 20s when it started to get darker. By my late 20's it was sort of dark blond, light brown. It gets blondish every summer from the sun, though, so people probably assume I am highlighting it. I have actually had a hair dresser say, "I can TELL you treat your hair because of the reddish highlights" when I hadn't done anything at all to it. |
Absolutely agree. My mother's been coloring her hair "medium ash blonde" for 50 years or so, and it's just way too light. The face loses pigment as we age, and artificially lighter hair just makes you look washed out, not younger. |