Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Any thoughts on what schools would take a boy with a 75th percentile overall on the SSAT, and grades of As and Bs.
Thank you. We may have aimed too high, and I'm belatedly wondering if I'm too late to apply to more schools.
I wish it were like college where you can see the range of what scores and grades the schools admit.
TIA
Even if you get into a Big 3, which I don't think a 75th percentile will do, your child will be in the middle to bottom part of the grade and will struggle. This can cause them to be stressed out to keep up with the workload. Do you have the option to stay where you are next year or is a public?
Or apply to other schools that are not pressure cookers. High school at Big 3 schools is 4 hours of work for even students with high scores. If a child is already coming in with lower than average scores he may struggle or may have even more hours to complete the work. I have heard parents have this issue time and time again by sending their child to a school that may not be a good fit ACADEMICALLY.
You have no idea what you're talking about. I actually do: I have a child at one of the so-called Big 3 schools who scored in the 62nd percentile when entering at 7th grade. Like everyone one of his peers in high school, he has a lot of homework. But it is manageable, even with multiple sports commitments outside of school. Yes, he is in the middle of the grade and I am completely fine with that. At these schools, the top 30% go to Ivies and the very top schools. The 30th to 60th percentile go to great schools. He is much, much better off being in the middle of the pack at this great school, where he is learning how to be competitive and successful in the real world, then he would be if her closer to the top (he would never be at the top, anywhere) at a mediocre-reputation school. This is common sense.
Interesting. I tend to agree that it's better to be in the middle of the pack at a great school. But here's one somewhat contrary view -- Malcolm Gladwell's David & Goliath has a chapter about a young woman named Caroline Sacks (a pseudonym). As I recall, she was admitted to Harvard (from a high school in the DC area) and pursued science. Even though she was incredibly intelligent, she felt "dumb" in her classes and labs compared to all of the high achievers at Harvard. She ended up leaving the field of science, thinking she was inadequate. She believes that, if she had gone to the U of Maryland, she would have continued to pursue her passion for science. Gladwell concludes it can be better to be the "Big Fish in the Small Pond."
I really like Gladwell's books, and I like his conclusion to the Caroline Sacks story (since it supports my personal belief and experience that you can be successful from any college). At the same time, I know at least 10 Harvard grads (whom I met in law school), and they all seem to be doing just fine and seem pretty content.
I'm not sure if any of this applies at the secondary school level, but it's food for thought.