You absolutely don't know what you're talking about. All three of my children were at 99+ and while they needed some differentiation and sometimes more challenge, they were absolutely fine at one of th Big 3s. How dare you label children you know nothing about? |
May you tone down a bit, please? I DARE as I have a 99.9 so do know what I am talking about. Good for you your children were absolutely fine. Not all children get enough with differentiation and some little challenge. Some children even loose interest in school - and fail. An high IQ score does not predict anything but a different way of thinking and handling things. It does not mean systematically success especially in a regular classroom setting. Fortunately DC is doing well but it took us parents a lot of energy to advocate - lower school was just an extremely bad experience in an excellent school in NW DC. |
| 96% and got into first choice - a big 3 |
Tone down? Look at your original post where you make sweeping generalizations about children who score at 99+ as "trouble" and needing "special accommodations," and a blanket statement that "private schools" are "not at all equipped" to provide accommodations needdd by such children. You're obviously a troll, as you know nothing about the WPPSI, private schools, or gifted children. |
It's "lose" |
| There are many kids with average WPPSI scores in Big 3s. I happen to know several of them. Your kid certainly doesn't need a 99%, a 90% or even 80% to get into one of these schools. |
I'm not OP, but you sound crazy. Why so defensive? I happen to think more along the lines of PP that schools seem to favor kids in the 80-90% than 99%. It doesn't mean they don't accept these kids or that these kids don't do as well, just that they're not typical. The typical student is above-average, but not gifted. And if you don't believe me, please talk to some of the ADs. They'll say the exact same thing. |
There is even a large difference between 99t percentile and 99.9th percentile. Most don't realize. |
And you sound like someone with reading comprehension problems. Take a look at the original post, which made sweeping claims about gifted children and private schools. It's true that not every child in the Top 3 schools are "gifted," but it's also true that not every child who scores 99.9 on the WPPSI can't function in a normal, private school environment. PP's child clearly could not, but many can. I think gifted children who are not integrated into "normal" environments are more prone to being out of sync with their peers in all ways. Gifted children are still children emotionally. They need to learn social skills and how to get along with other children who are not gifted. Because eventually they'll need to figure out how to relate to people who are not gifted. If they don't, they may lead some sad lives. I say that as someone who scores 170 on the SB scale and went through public schools with minimal "intervention." I was allowed to do a lot of independent work and had the support of some great teachers. I am the poster whose children are all at 99.9 -- forgive me for not adding the decimal -- it sounds braggy to me, but since some readers needed to make that distinction clear ...
|
LOL. laughing my ass off. First, schools only get a portion of the full battery of tests as what they are calling the WPSIi, so it doesn't even meatier all that could be measured. More importantly, testing of three and for year olds is notoriously unreliable. You simply can't accurately predict intellectual capacity or future academic performance at that age. Looking at gradations within a single percentile is nuts. The only real value of the test at this age is to try to pick up bigger potential problems, as a very tough predictor. And with kids being counseled out throughout lower and middle school, even rough predictions don't always work. |
| Whoops. Rough predictor, not tough predictor. Voice to text doesn't always work. |
What is normal environment? All those gifted kids that attend Feynman or are in the G&T schools are also in a normal environment. So many bizarre assumptions that learning with your academic peers means not getting proper socialization. |
PP accused to be a troll. Unfortunately I am not. And I really do not get why you are so offensive about this. Good for you you made it through and so did your children: it is usually not the case at that level of giftedness, no matter how hard you try to defend your position. Just accept the fact that your case is not common and your family was really lucky. And please, some people may have different views and be as gifted are you are
|
|
Pp, how am I offensive?
I believe that many, many kids that score in the highest percentages can benefit from differentiation and proper learning environments. I don't know how, as was previously posted, one assumes education in places with peers of similar intellectual abilities is somehow doing them a disservice, socially. This in conjecture, at best. |
How would you know? It appears that you are not gifted, as your writing suggests that you are incapable of stringing together a grammatical sentence. |