What happens if Hillary is found guilty after winning?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what happens if charges are brought against Hillary after she wins and assuming she's guilty? Can she take office in January and have this play out for the next year or so while President? God help us all if we have to go through this.

And no, I'm not a Trump supporter.

Guilty of what? At this point Abedin or Weiner will be the fall person. There is no EMAIL from Hillary that went to Weiner. Hillary is not responsible if Huma sends confidential emails to a computer shared with another person without security clearance. But then Huma herself may not directly deal with top secret stuff.

This may at worst be damaging to Hillary and elevate the con man to be president, which is sad and tells a lot about the American naivete.

Suppose it's really all about Obama and the shenanigans he was involved in, and they are throwing Hillary under the bus?

Yep. The Wikileaks showed that Obama lied re: knowing about Hillary's private server.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nice try, Trumpettes. This will have no effect on the election or aftermath, she will win, it's over, and you can call her Madame President.

And we better all start learning Russian

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what happens if charges are brought against Hillary after she wins and assuming she's guilty? Can she take office in January and have this play out for the next year or so while President? God help us all if we have to go through this.

And no, I'm not a Trump supporter.

Some people feel this is a calculated move by Comey to do just that. Sweep it off the table at a time when the DNC could replace her and bring it back at a time when they could not. If she wins her entire presidency will be this case. If she loses it will be because of this case.

Its freaking messed up and it sucks for our country. And no, I'm not a Hillary supporter.

Maybe Comey sent the letter so that he won't disappear mysteriously.

[Anonymous]

Come should be fired. He clearly tried toi nfluence the election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what happens if charges are brought against Hillary after she wins and assuming she's guilty? Can she take office in January and have this play out for the next year or so while President? God help us all if we have to go through this.

And no, I'm not a Trump supporter.

Guilty of what? At this point Abedin or Weiner will be the fall person. There is no EMAIL from Hillary that went to Weiner. Hillary is not responsible if Huma sends confidential emails to a computer shared with another person without security clearance. But then Huma herself may not directly deal with top secret stuff.

This may at worst be damaging to Hillary and elevate the con man to be president, which is sad and tells a lot about the American naivete.

It's the lack of quality from either party. These candidates were put forth with a very small group of the electorate.

I agree about the candidates being bad BUT it is false equivalence TRUMP is like multiple order of terrible, its not a comparison.

NYT Columnist(link below) has explained the Real Dangers of Trump clearly with highly plausible scenarios. Anyone with any ability to analyze will see how insane it is to elect Trump.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/30/opinion/sunday/t...-donald-trump.html?ref=opinion

"It's the lack of quality from either party. These candidates were put forth with a very small group of the electorate."

False equivalence? Where in my statement did I attempt to compare. There is a LACK OF QUALITY means just that. Don't care if there is one worse than the other, both are bad options.

[Anonymous]

Clinton is hardly a bad option. She's the most qualified candidate to ever run for office. The media has been awful to her and she's come out on top (so far).

I think she's handled herself beautifully during the campaign. I'd never have the kind of restraint she has when Trump shoots off his awful Cheerio shaped mouth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Clinton is hardly a bad option. She's the most qualified candidate to ever run for office. The media has been awful to her and she's come out on top (so far).

I think she's handled herself beautifully during the campaign. I'd never have the kind of restraint she has when Trump shoots off his awful Cheerio shaped mouth.

Not really. She can handle the planned stuff, but did you see how she couldn't even take questions the other day. Three, and she picked the three she knew would go easy on her. She is going to be mess as soon as something goes wrong in her administration. (And yes, unfortunately she is going to be President) And then when they find something on that computer, she is going to get impeached just like her husband. What a legacy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what happens if charges are brought against Hillary after she wins and assuming she's guilty? Can she take office in January and have this play out for the next year or so while President? God help us all if we have to go through this.

And no, I'm not a Trump supporter.

too late now to replace her

She'd be in. Then they'd impeach her and bring in Kaine who would have to pick a VP.

I prefer this situation to what we have.

I hate Hillary. Trump's not even worth my time.

Plus one. After the first debate Hillary almost had me then I went undecided again. Now I will be voting Trump after this latest fiasco and pray that if Hillary wins Kaine takes over upon her impeachment. She is going down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Clinton is hardly a bad option. She's the most qualified candidate to ever run for office. The media has been awful to her and she's come out on top (so far).

I think she's handled herself beautifully during the campaign. I'd never have the kind of restraint she has when Trump shoots off his awful Cheerio shaped mouth.

for heaven's sake, she couldn't even be bothered to turn to page 2 of Comey's letter.

[Anonymous]

"Not a Trump supporters" in this thread and on this board are such a damned joke. And, ^^ impeachment, really? The investigation was NOT in fact reopened. READ A NEWSPAPER! HRC is no danger of any charges, let alone of having committed perjury. You are reaching, and are so intellectually dishonest. Par for the course.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Not a Trump supporters" in this thread and on this board are such a damned joke. And, ^^ impeachment, really? The investigation was NOT in fact reopened. READ A NEWSPAPER! HRC is no danger of any charges, let alone of having committed perjury. You are reaching, and are so intellectually dishonest. Par for the course.

like the washington post?

headline: "Clinton campaign scrambles to respond to renewed FBI investigation"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-campaign-scrambled-saturday-to-respond-to-renewed-fbi-investigation/2016/10/29/54fce40e-9df4-11e6-a0ed-ab0774c1eaa5_story.html

[Anonymous]

Trumpkins are such idiots. True drivel. Even paid russian shill can't come up with sh1t this stupid.

[Anonymous]

"The F.B.I. director’s letter did not reopen the Clinton inquiry, though some Republicans, including Donald J. Trump, characterized the move that way. Agents could open a new inquiry if they find evidence that the earlier investigation had been impeded or that classified materials had been intentionally mishandled."

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/31/us/politics/fbi-hillary-clinton-emails.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"The F.B.I. director’s letter did not reopen the Clinton inquiry, though some Republicans, including Donald J. Trump, characterized the move that way. Agents could open a new inquiry if they find evidence that the earlier investigation had been impeded or that classified materials had been intentionally mishandled."

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/31/us/politics/fbi-hillary-clinton-emails.html

so when you said "READ A NEWSPAPER" you meant "READ THE NEW YORK TIMES, AND ONLY THE NEW YORK TIMES"

[Anonymous]

No, you absurd shill @ 22:18. "Renewed" is not in fact a synonym for "reopen." GET A DICTIONARY.

You're losing. Why don't you get offline and try and see how you can support your female analogue, that poor brain-broken woman arrested for voting fraud in Iowa? Dishonest folk like you and her should stick together!