Does anyone actually think the OP is a Trump supporter? |
To go nosing around those websites? Yes, that takes commitment. |
And hard liquor! |
|
OP, I actually clicked on all your links, and then clicked on further links to see where they were getting their information.
What a load of hooey!
That is just a link to the following message: "Ohio had early voting today. We voted! Send a BIG FAT message to WA ... we are sick of their BS! We voted for CHANGE today ... " Note -- why is she trying to send a BIG FAT message to Washington State?? What's wrong with Washington State? Maybe the change she wants is better geography instruction?
That link just led to this message: "Sorry, the page you were looking for in this blog does not exist."
That link led to this message: "Sorry, that page doesn’t exist!" Was there something you were trying to link to, to prove any of your "points"?? |
Most links worked for me. The blog this time did not - it did yesterday. Could be because the reporting of early voting is not really kosher, and the blogger decided not to go there after all. |
Well, good for descodingsatant.blogspot if that is the case -- a lot of the looney blogs don't take their claims down when shown to be wrong. And this Twitter link from SW OHIO for Trump is back up (maybe I mistyped or something) https://twitter.com/TrumpSWOhio/status/789684952036179969 Early Voting In Florida Shows Trump Winning Election By Landslide « InvestmentWatch http://fb.me/7DpL3EOTi The link takes you here, a blog post dated 10/21/2016 that reads like a cobbled-together book report. http://investmentwatchblog.com/early-voting-in-florida-shows-trump-winning-election-by-landslide
That blog post has a link to here, dated 9/24/2016: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/09/yuge-trump-leads-early-voting-florida-120000-first-republicans-state/ and cites this "news" dated Sept. 24th http://nalert.blogspot.com/2016/09/florida-shocker-republicans-winning-by.html
Both blog posts reference the Florida Division of Elections Vote-by-Mail Request and Early Voting Reports which doesn't back up what the blogs are claiming. Which just shows the party affiliation of people who have requested absentee ballots, and who have already filled them out and sent them back -- pretty evenly split between dems and republicans. 20,000 more republicans than Dems have returned their absentee ballots already. 11,000 more dems than republicans requested absentee ballots. There is a column for "voted early" as well but as of 10/23/2016 no data has been entered there. There are no results yet. No votes have been counted. |
Really surprised at some of the hateful posts on this thread. |
As are most Trumpanzees |
Is the room you're in padded? I hope so. |