If you are "hot", you are hired in Trump's businesses - no qualification needed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:ITT...bunches of fat jealous women...

A beautiful smart women would be grossed out by this man, too. It has nothing to do with "fat jealous women". Any self respecting woman, regardless of how she looks would not appreciate those comments in regards to employment, or the gross, inappropriate touching.

[Anonymous]

If you are not "hot" enough, you should be fired from trump businesses

http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-na-pol-trump-women/

This shit show cannot get any better.

Donald Trump wanted only the pretty ones, his employees said.

After the Trump National Golf Club in Rancho Palos Verdes opened for play in 2005, its world-famous owner didn’t stop by more than a few times a year to visit the course hugging the coast of the Pacific.

When Trump did visit, the club’s managers went on alert. They scheduled the young, thin, pretty women on staff to work the clubhouse restaurant — because when Trump saw less-attractive women working at his club, according to court records, he wanted them fired.

"I had witnessed Donald Trump tell managers many times while he was visiting the club that restaurant hostesses were 'not pretty enough' and that they should be fired and replaced with more attractive women,” Hayley Strozier, who was director of catering at the club until 2008, said in a sworn declaration.

Initially, Trump gave this command “almost every time” he visited, Strozier said. Managers eventually changed employee schedules “so that the most attractive women were scheduled to work when Mr. Trump was scheduled to be at the club," she said.

A similar story is told by former Trump employees in court documents filed in 2012 in a broad labor relations lawsuit brought against one of Trump’s development companies in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

[Anonymous]

Not surprising. Noticed all his female family members and campaign workers all lot just alike. He's either selecting them that way, or pressuring them to have a specific look. It's crazy. And extremely noticeable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not surprising. Noticed all his female family members and campaign workers all lot just alike. He's either selecting them that way, or pressuring them to have a specific look. It's crazy. And extremely noticeable.

This is sickening and sad that his supporters see no wrong in spite of all wrong doing coming out.

[Anonymous]

Binders full of attractive women? But seriously, this dovetails with the stories of casino floor managers taking AAs off the floor when Trump was visiting.

[Anonymous]

Related story:

http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/587705.page

Basically, there was a lawsuit against Trump for this exact thing.

[Anonymous]

In the alternative - if you find Trump distasteful - I believe Bill Clinton may be able to find rewarding opportunities for you to service his needs instead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In the alternative - if you find Trump distasteful - I believe Bill Clinton may be able to find rewarding opportunities for you to service his needs instead.

Is this the new squirrel? Can you focus for moment? On your candidate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In the alternative - if you find Trump distasteful - I believe Bill Clinton may be able to find rewarding opportunities for you to service his needs instead.

As much as you would like to divert the attention of all the despicable things Trump has done, I have not seen a video of Bill Clinton squeezing a young lady and offering her a job on the spot because of her "hotness". Neither would you find lawsuit that he wanted employees fired for not being pretty. Y

Now, can we get back to the current Presidential candidate Trump. You seem to be very disturbed by Bill Clinton's transgression. I am sure you would not be supporting Trump (Bill Clinton's problems on steroid) this election, right?

[Anonymous]

Off the top of my head - he had a press conference at the Trump Hotel in DC several months ago and told a young woman in the audience on the spot that he would find a job for her there. Not surprisingly, she was very attractive. Will try to find link.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the alternative - if you find Trump distasteful - I believe Bill Clinton may be able to find rewarding opportunities for you to service his needs instead.

As much as you would like to divert the attention of all the despicable things Trump has done, I have not seen a video of Bill Clinton squeezing a young lady and offering her a job on the spot because of her "hotness". Neither would you find lawsuit that he wanted employees fired for not being pretty. Y

Now, can we get back to the current Presidential candidate Trump. You seem to be very disturbed by Bill Clinton's transgression. I am sure you would not be supporting Trump (Bill Clinton's problems on steroid) this election, right?

Trump's problems are not the same as Bill's. But you're correct that I will not be voting for Trump.

[Anonymous]

Are we talking about Donald Trump or Bill Clinton?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are we talking about Donald Trump or Bill Clinton?

I think it depends on what kind of services you're willing to provide.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we talking about Donald Trump or Bill Clinton?

I think it depends on what kind of services you're willing to provide.

This thread is about Trump's hiring and firing decisions based on women's look and his inappropriate behavior with women in public. If you want to discuss Bill Clinton you are welcome to start another thread.

[Anonymous]

Welcome to real life. I had a few cute women in my law class that had far lower grades than me yet received big money NYC firm offers.