| When millions die because of Disney movies I will stop allowing those too. No brainier. Till then I have no problem with them, and will continue to avoid the bible. |
|
my husband is more religious than I am so we go to Church (sporadically). I'm sure at some point I will more directly address my lack of belief but in the meantime I take the ministers tack of focusing on the parable.
That said my non-religious Dad got me a comic book version of the bible as a kid that I loved, so I got one for my kids and the 8 year old loved it. 6 year old hasn't read it yet but I hope she will when she's ready. Bible stories are such a touchstone for so much of western literature that I felt it was important that my kids be familiar with them in order to catch the literary references. |
+1 |
|
I am Christian and was raised in a family that attended church/Sunday School every Sunday.
I had a pretty good education in religion and the stories from the Bible. Or, so I thought. When I went to college, I took a class in Chaucer (not an English major - it was a class that was part of the basic things that Freshmen had to take). What I discovered is that in order to truly understand and appreciate some of the classic literature, you really have to have an understanding of the Bible. So much of what was written centuries ago had references to Biblical stories and events. Our professor was British, and bemoaned the fact that in the US, we have not been really taught the Bible as a piece of literature. He spent a great deal of time educating us on the Bible so that we could understand the stories written by Chaucer. So, I do believe it is worthy and important to teach children not only Biblical stories, but allow them, or encourage them, to view the Bible as a piece of literature and study it as you would any other classic. |
As a minister, assuming you went to seminary, you have the advantage of having been taught, at the graduate level, that the Bible stories are myth - useful myth, but myth, nonetheless. Most other Christians don't have that advantage. |
Yes, but they were fairy tales. You weren't supposed to beleive they were true and you wouldn't be threatened with hell for not believing them. |
Bible stories are not generally portrayed as being "made up." They are presented as "true" and something that you must believe or be severely punished -- for eternity! The stakes are much higher. |
But everyone knows it's a "story" right? Not seomthing you're supposed to believe. |
+1 |
| My MIL gives my kids religious story books. I happily read them to them so they know many of the stories that are cultural norms. We also talk about what Christians believe (and other religions) and what their dad and I believe. There's lots of 'what do you think?' questions thrown back at them. I have considered getting them a children's bible to talk about the stories, but haven't yet - though they've looked at them at other people's houses. |
|
Yes, that's the greatest value of Biblical stories, IMHO. Raised as a Roman Catholic, I didn't study the Bible as other Christians did, but I knew a lot of the stories, just from watching TV. Never could quote the bible, Chapter and verse, though. |
Faulty premise. |
Not true for anything after the XV century. |
Maybe so, but a lot of worthwhile stuff happened before the XV century. The improtant thing to remember is that you can teach about the Bible, without teaching people to believe in the Bible. Think of it like Greek Mythology, or Aesop's fables -- useful, but not factual. |