Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Interesting article. Love articles that examine relative risks!
"So here's another possibility. It's not that risks to children have increased, provoking an increase in moral outrage when children are left unattended. Instead, it could be that moral attitudes toward parenting have changed, such that leaving children unsupervised is now judged morally wrong. And because it's judged morally wrong, people overestimate the risk."
http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2016/08/22/490847797/why-do-we-judge-parents-for-putting-kids-at-perceived-but-unreal-risk?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20160822
First, I didn't click through all the links in the article, but the link to support "eight times more children are killed in parking lots than in parked cars" is completely bogus.
It's a 2014 NYPost article saying that 19 to 23 kids had died in hot cars during January-August 2014, as compared to an estimated 68 struck by cars. That is not in any way support for saying that leaving your kid in the car is safer. Actually very disappointing from NPR.
That aside, I don't agree with the article's conclusions about moral attitudes toward parenting. I think people consider the need to take the risk, and have negative views of unnecessary risk. Driving is statistically really risky, but I need to get my child to school and we are not a society set up around walkable schools. So, the driving risk is not seen as that bad, compared to other options. Leaving your kid alone in a house so you can play Pokemon is an unnecessary risk, even if statistically unlikely to have a bad result. The reason we're divided about a mom leaving her kid to play in the park while the mom works is that we disagree, culturally, about access to childcare and income for a person in that mom's situation -- i.e., about her choices and the need to do that.
People also consider perceived control. Although it's false to believe you completely control your driving risk -- you can always be hit by someone else -- you do have the choice to drive safely. When your child is unattended, you have no control over the events or the aftermath, e.g., getting your child to safety or medical help.
I do think there are "recent" factors, including the constant barrage of unlikely horror stories shared over media in a way they weren't previously. I also think that culturally we (everyone, including moms) are uncomfortable with the tension between being a mother and a worker (and a person with hobbies, etc.) and so you see a lot of mommy-wars judgment and guilt over whether you are doing enough for your kid, including spending enough time supervising them and protecting them. That's the negative side of control.