Wikileaks released 23,000 classified emails.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So wiki leaks had them, but not the FBI?

Who knows? It's a secret.

Everything is secret.

And that is the problem: the classification system was never intended to be used in the way it is being used.

Of course, it's difficult to investigate this abuse since virtually no journalists have clearance, and they could not reveal anything even if they did.

It is a break-down of the checks and balances system on which our republic was founded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So wiki leaks had them, but not the FBI?

Who knows? It's a secret.

Everything is secret.

And that is the problem: the classification system was never intended to be used in the way it is being used.

Of course, it's difficult to investigate this abuse since virtually no journalists have clearance, and they could not reveal anything even if they did.

It is a break-down of the checks and balances system on which our republic was founded.

That is not the meaning of "checks and balances".

[Anonymous]

*YAWN*

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So wiki leaks had them, but not the FBI?

Who knows? It's a secret.

That apparently only OP knows. That tweet is dated 2 weeks ago, my guess is nothing came of it because there was nothing there

Nice distraction. The date of the release is a relevant the fact is there is 23,000 classified emails just to confidential classification. We noticed there is many top secret emails also released they're much more damaging

No, I think PP is right. If there were something to this, it would have come out weeks ago.

+1
And anyone who has worked with classified stuff knows that "classified" doesn't mean amazing top secrets that will blow your mind.

I have and understand TS means the disclosure of which causes exceptionally grave damage to national security. We know TS stuff was on her server and was disclosed to uncleared people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So wiki leaks had them, but not the FBI?

Who knows? It's a secret.

That apparently only OP knows. That tweet is dated 2 weeks ago, my guess is nothing came of it because there was nothing there

Nice distraction. The date of the release is a relevant the fact is there is 23,000 classified emails just to confidential classification. We noticed there is many top secret emails also released they're much more damaging

No, I think PP is right. If there were something to this, it would have come out weeks ago.

+1
And anyone who has worked with classified stuff knows that "classified" doesn't mean amazing top secrets that will blow your mind.

I have and understand TS means the disclosure of which causes exceptionally grave damage to national security. We know TS stuff was on her server and was disclosed to uncleared people.

BFD - a few tidbits of information were classified after the fact to justify a phony scandal. Please move on with your life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So wiki leaks had them, but not the FBI?

Who knows? It's a secret.

That apparently only OP knows. That tweet is dated 2 weeks ago, my guess is nothing came of it because there was nothing there

Nice distraction. The date of the release is a relevant the fact is there is 23,000 classified emails just to confidential classification. We noticed there is many top secret emails also released they're much more damaging

No, I think PP is right. If there were something to this, it would have come out weeks ago.

+1
And anyone who has worked with classified stuff knows that "classified" doesn't mean amazing top secrets that will blow your mind.

I have and understand TS means the disclosure of which causes exceptionally grave damage to national security. We know TS stuff was on her server and was disclosed to uncleared people.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Here is the link. The DNC undermined Sanders. Democratic primary was rigged as the DNC was not impartial. This article describes the emails:

http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-proves-primary-was-rigged-dnc-undermined-democracy/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here is the link. The DNC undermined Sanders. Democratic primary was rigged as the DNC was not impartial. This article describes the emails:

http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-proves-primary-was-rigged-dnc-undermined-democracy/

This is not news. Sanders was never going to win. Another Democrat may have won against Clinton, but not Sanders.

[Anonymous]

Wikileaks thread on Twitter is highlighting some of the emails. It's unbelievable. These people are crooked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is the link. The DNC undermined Sanders. Democratic primary was rigged as the DNC was not impartial. This article describes the emails:

http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-proves-primary-was-rigged-dnc-undermined-democracy/

This is not news. Sanders was never going to win. Another Democrat may have won against Clinton, but not Sanders.

Another candidate close to DNC was not going to run. Because they were convinced otherwise. How, I don't know. Sanders is the only one who would have the guts. My guess is they let it happen, because duh, they need someone to run against, and someone who will make Hillary look good (chortle). O Malley was also allowed because they knew he would fizzle out.