Not once you have notice! It shifts the burden. |
|
I think it would be a neighborly thing to look into it. It's true you might get a discount if you both get work done at the same time. I would still get my own estimate, (let that company know about his work, too) -- but you might be surprised that it isn't very expensive in the scheme of things.
It's probably a good idea to at least look into it, if you plan to be there awhile. You never know when you might need him to do something for you! |
|
See here - neighbor's tree falls on your house your insurance still pays for the damage
https://www.angieslist.com/articles/my-neighbor-s-tree-fell-my-house-who-pays.htm |
Well, then proceed. Why are you asking us? You aren't going to do anything. |
Omg. Yes. In a normal situation. But once you have notice, it is different. There is an entire body of law that has hashed this out over many, many years. |
You very much will care if it falls and does damage, and you're responsible for it. |
+1 if you've already decided to do nothing then do nothing. |
Not really, the neighbor can say they gave notice and submit a claim to your insurance but it does not shift blame. If a tree falls and causes NO DAMAGE it's your job to remove the tree, anyway. Again - https://www.angieslist.com/articles/my-neighbor-s-tree-fell-my-house-who-pays.htm Telling the neighbor they have a dead tree in the back of their yard that is no threat to either house is going to affect insurance claims how? |
|
To replace an old swing set that no one uses? You guys are crazy.
OP, get a second opinion and then move on from there. At least you can then say it isn't in your budget and like a pp said, tell your neighbor if he is concerned he can remove it. |
Cutting dead trees down and limb trimming are normal maintenance in having a yard. Well go ahead and do nothing and have your tree or other trees damage your house, fall on people, and other people's houses. You'll pay for it one way or another. I feel bad for your neighbor. However, if I was in his shoes and you told me you could not pay for it, I would pay for it because chasing you down for damages later will be futile. |
You should really look at the entire body of law that governs this. Because you are wrong. |
Yes this. If falling in any direction could cause damage you don't want to pay for out of pocket you now have to take it down. |
|
| If the tree isn't near the house and is easily accessible in the backyard, it should be relatively inexpensive to take down. If the tree guys have a lot of room to work and don't have to be extra precious about making sure the tree doesn't fall on anything, they can get it done a lot faster and you can save money by not having the stump ground, if you are so inclined. Just a thought. |
Yes. And neighbor was responsible. It was a great day and my legal education finally paid off! |