Whether there is a science SOL isn't the determiner as to whether there is a lot of substance to science in a particular year. |
From a longtime AAP parent (child started in third and did it all the way through MS): This post is right. It's socially harder and harder with each passing year to change schools, so go ahead and do it in third grade. And yes, it helps with math progression so your child is on the same page as the rest of the class. Our DD's elementary AAP center had one or two kids who came in new each year, and while they did fine both academically and socially, I know from talking with their parents that they all wished they had started AAP in third and just gone all the way through, rather than waiting. Bear in mind, that's just some parents, at one center, but it's what I found. As for the conflict in above posts about "fourth grade is nothing but history" or "no, it's not" -- we found that each grade had plenty of every subject. Not sure where the "odd and even year" myth came from, OP. That's a new one to me. It's just not so; please don't give it any credence and if you know parents who go around saying that -- please tell them to ask an elementary AAP teacher who can let them know this is just pure myth. |
|
If DS gets into AAP our thought was to do LLIV until his younger sister gets in (or see if she gets in) and then move them both to the center. DS would be entering 5th as they are 2 yrs apart. Most kids go to the center but some do stay for LLIV. We thought this would be the best option. Based on your advice it seems my son wouldn't be behind but would lose out on a peer group. Would your advice stand? Also, what if we stayed LLIV through 6th, any thoughts on how it would affect DS in terms of making AAP friends in 7th and 8th? Anyone done this? Not done center in ES. How did your AAP child integrate with other AAP kids in MS? |
I am willing to bet if they had a science SOL that year she would have spent more time on science. |