South Carolinians can view the flag in whichever way they want. That will not change the fact that a great many people view the flag as having racial implications. As I mentioned in the other thread, swastikas have many non-racist connotations. But anyone employing a swastika in a non-racist circumstance would be stupid to ignore the wider implications. |
america didn't consider it a "quest for independence". And since they were Americans, that what counts. I wouldnt expect to consider the revolutionary war a "quest" |
So is the Confederate Flag going to fly at Half Staff or nah in commemoration of the shooting? |
So if we find some citizens of South Carolina that agree with me that it is inappropriate for the state to fly that flag, then....? |
If the majority of people living there wanted to change their THEIR flag, I expect that they would. Unless selecting state flags becomes federal business, I am not sure why we're discussing this, honestly. |
I agree that all indications suggest that the majority of people living in South Carolina are content to be represented by a flag that was flown by those in armed rebellion against the Government of the United States (i.e. traitors) in defense of slavery. What I don't understand is why that majority doesn't seem to understand why this makes them look like a bunch of racists. |
|
That is a very good question, but not so much for us here in DC but for them down there in SC. Anyone here from SC who can try to explain the (majority) SC perspective? |
Because... racism. |
I respect the legitimacy of victors' justice, of course, but "traitors" is a bridge too far. Whether the Constitution allowed for secession was an open question until it was settled by Justices Sherman and Grant, who put broad swathes of the South to the torch. Not that in some ways they didn't have it coming, of course. |
It's not a matter of "victor's justice". When they attacked Fort Sumter, the issue was decided. They went to war against America. |
Oh FFS, you lost. Get over it already. |
That doesn't make them "traitors," although I would concede it makes them "foolish." |
You're right, of course. All discussions should be limited to those that concern the federal government or the state in which you reside. ![]() |
How many ways can you sugar coat an act of war? |