Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They look 45 which is surprising be they have been rich their entire lives and have had access to the best skin care and make up and food etc etc.

I'm 45. I know a lot of people in my age group who do not look that scary.

It looks like their hair, make up, clothes and expressions are all done to enhance their... odd... look. Were they at a Beetlejuice convention?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They look 45 which is surprising be they have been rich their entire lives and have had access to the best skin care and make up and food etc etc.

One, if not both, smoke

Smoking + gaunt = premature aging.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think this is what happens when you get too much plastic surgery at a young age.

I don't see any evidence of plastic surgery. I think the fact that they are both clearly underweight has a lot to do with their extreme faces.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They look 45 which is surprising be they have been rich their entire lives and have had access to the best skin care and make up and food etc etc.

One, if not both, smoke

And one had an eating disorder which can age you

[Anonymous]

The one on the left always does that thing with her lips, like she just sucked on a lemon.

[Anonymous]

I can't believe they are not identical twins.

[Anonymous]

I was thinking of that creepy girl from the ring except grown up

[Anonymous]

They look a little creepy, but def not 45 to me. They own their look. Like Anna Wintour. It's very high-fashion, definitely not sexy, but I dig it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They look 45 which is surprising be they have been rich their entire lives and have had access to the best skin care and make up and food etc etc.

One, if not both, smoke

And one had an eating disorder which can age you

+1. Very aging.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They look a little creepy, but def not 45 to me. They own their look. Like Anna Wintour. It's very high-fashion, definitely not sexy, but I dig it.

So what makes it high fashion? Because it's uncommon, because it costs a lot? I'm really curious. Is it innovative design inspired by something else?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They look a little creepy, but def not 45 to me. They own their look. Like Anna Wintour. It's very high-fashion, definitely not sexy, but I dig it.

The picture was at a fashion ball a couple of nights ago in NYC with many celebrities deliberately going for a high-fashion look. I'd bet they look creepy anywhere but they had an excuse/justification - take your pick - that evening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They look a little creepy, but def not 45 to me. They own their look. Like Anna Wintour. It's very high-fashion, definitely not sexy, but I dig it.

So what makes it high fashion? Because it's uncommon, because it costs a lot? I'm really curious. Is it innovative design inspired by something else?

Yes, the point of high fashion isn't glamour, although it can be glamorous. It is to be uncommon and in a different realm than everyday life. If you studied art, think of the mannerist paintings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just saw this photo -- nothing new, I guess, but they look particularly scary here:

Damn, Africa, what happened to them?

They look like Fred Armisen cloned himself then they both dressed in goth drag.

[Anonymous]

They always look miserable. Do they ever smile? I've never seen it (as adults).