Slate.com - what happened?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Not crazy about Slate, at all, but it's not as bad as Salon. Wow. What utter, pretentious garbage.


Pretentious? Not usually. Although I gave up reading Jenny Kutner's, Soraiya (Forgot her last name)'s, and Brittney Cooper's bad writing. Just awful. I got about a part of the way through Cooper's diatribe against the word "African-American," an article in which it seemed like she was claiming whiye people used the word out of fear of the word "black." I was just done after reading that inanity.
Anonymous
What happened was they let go real experienced writers and hired Millennials barely out of college for cheap and it shows. A lot of online places are doing the same thing so you get what you pay for. Garbage.
Anonymous
It jumped the shark a year ago. Emblematic of the dumbing down of America. I weep for the future.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Not crazy about Slate, at all, but it's not as bad as Salon. Wow. What utter, pretentious garbage.


+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ha I thought I was the only one who started hating it from the time of its website redesign


+1


Definitely not the only one. I miss the old Slate.
Anonymous
Recommendations for an alternative? I miss the old Slate and Salon. Or was it just because I was younger when I read them?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Recommendations for an alternative? I miss the old Slate and Salon. Or was it just because I was younger when I read them?


Atlantic Monthly, New York Magazine
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Recommendations for an alternative? I miss the old Slate and Salon. Or was it just because I was younger when I read them?


Atlantic Monthly, New York Magazine


New Yorker. Atlantic. Mother Jones.
Anonymous
Scientific American , New Yorker , Smithsonian.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Scientific American , New Yorker , Smithsonian.


And The Economist, if you want to understand how things truly work.
Anonymous
There was a great article on slate a few months ago tracking back the myth of the welfare queen, which was super interesting. Every once in a while I still see something like that. But I agree that most of it now is pretty shallow, and often is just ill-informed commentary on some headline news, without the writer actually having learned about the issue. (Or like someone will comment on a science article, but it's like their comment is based entirely on just the headline to the original article, and therefore often totally off-base.)
Anonymous
I agree with the Economist. Also National Geographic and Financial Times. NYT.
Anonymous
I still read Slate and Salon, but both are getting close to self-parody.

Slate runs those You're Doing It Wrong cooking features, which sound like a good idea until you read them and find out they don't set you straight on technique at all -- they just try an off-the-wall twist.

Salon is apparently having an internal battle over whether Bill Maher is right or very, very wrong, and so it simply alternates that viewpoint with each article.
Anonymous
John Dickerson is a very good political reporter.
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: