She didn't. You must have misinterpreted the post. PP was asking why her child has to sit through a lesson on "[the differences between] their and there". That may or may not be a valid question, depending on whether one considers such a lesson at the appropriate level for third grade AAP, but the question didn't contain any misuse of words |
| My AAP 3rd grader's word lists have included: there, their, they're, beautiful, could, should, would, really, sure, and others. Not super-challenging but words that will be used/written fairly frequently. |
|
Yet the majority of third grade AAP students are unable to use the proper there, their, they're.
Signed, Third grade AAP teacher |
Then why aren't they studying THIRD grade words? They will need to use words like Friday, breakfast, October, finally, always, house, etc., etc. much more than they will need to use words like subterranean or prehistoric. I understand the importance of learning prefixes and suffixes and the importance of spelling more complex words. But shouldn't that be AFTER they have shown mastery of words that a 3rd grader would normally use? |
| Steam, sweet, honey...this week we're working on hard 'e' sounds, but my son is in lower spelling group. His bonus words are thesaurus, dictionary... |
Couldn't agree more. Just because they are being taught advanced stuff, doesn't mean they are learning. |