Sole Custody- How to win Sole Custody in MD.

[Anonymous]

Thanks for all the responses.

I just want to say to am not fighting the un-supervised visitation at his home. But every case must be judge on its own merit.

Here are a few additions to my situation:

My ex is wealthy and has attempted to use his economic influence to sway a short time baby sitter to say things against me and others.

He fabricated tons of charges against me, none has no merits

He has 2 other special needs sons, one of them would not even talk to him

The women he meets online has manipulated him for money and some of them are on drugs. Has evidence of that.

He has repeatedly threatened to turn the carbon monoxide on in the room

And I will not mention the abuse I endured with him. I want my 7 months old son to be protected.

[Anonymous]

Thanks for all the responses.
I just want to say to am not fighting the un-supervised visitation at his home. But every case must be judge on its own merit.
Here are a few additions to my situation:
My ex is wealthy and has attempted to use his economic influence to sway a short time baby sitter to say things against me and others.
He fabricated tons of charges against me, none has no merits
He has 2 other special needs sons, one of them would not even talk to him and the other who lives with him has a drug addict. My ex also overdoses on medications and uses non prescribed medications.
The women he meets online has manipulated him for money and some of them are on drugs. Has evidence of that.
He has repeatedly threatened to turn the carbon monoxide on in the room
And I will not mention the abuse I endured with him. I want my 7 months old son to be protected. Thank for reading.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You are already getting the best possible outcome. My ex was convicted of domestic violence against me. He is also a diagnosed schizophrenic on medication, and he was still granted partial custody. If I were you, I would be very thankful that it's supervised visitation.

That is NUTS. What is wrong with our courts? It's as if the father's rights matter more than the children's rights.

[Anonymous]

Good luck OP. I'll be thinking of you.

[Anonymous]

OP learning English will take you further with this.

[Anonymous]

OP,
Of course you want your son to be protected. That's what supervised visitation will accomplish. I'm not clear what any of these points about your ex has to do with supervised visitation being problematic. I am not clear what fighting the judge's recommendation would accomplish. It would likely cost tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees and you would probably not prevail. Make sure you can afford legal representation down the road should he asked for unsupervised visitation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thanks for all the responses.
I just want to say to am not fighting the un-supervised visitation at his home. But every case must be judge on its own merit.
Here are a few additions to my situation:
My ex is wealthy and has attempted to use his economic influence to sway a short time baby sitter to say things against me and others.
He fabricated tons of charges against me, none has no merits
He has 2 other special needs sons, one of them would not even talk to him and the other who lives with him has a drug addict. My ex also overdoses on medications and uses non prescribed medications.
The women he meets online has manipulated him for money and some of them are on drugs. Has evidence of that.
He has repeatedly threatened to turn the carbon monoxide on in the room
And I will not mention the abuse I endured with him. I want my 7 months old son to be protected. Thank for reading.

In all seriousness, why did you have a baby with him knowing this information?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thanks for all the responses.

I just want to say to am not fighting the un-supervised visitation at his home. But every case must be judge on its own merit.

Here are a few additions to my situation:

My ex is wealthy and has attempted to use his economic influence to sway a short time baby sitter to say things against me and others.

He fabricated tons of charges against me, none has no merits

He has 2 other special needs sons, one of them would not even talk to him

The women he meets online has manipulated him for money and some of them are on drugs. Has evidence of that.

He has repeatedly threatened to turn the carbon monoxide on in the room

And I will not mention the abuse I endured with him. I want my 7 months old son to be protected.

You cannot hold his past against him with his sons as you knew this before you got married and had kids. You didn't really expect him to change for you. You got supervised visitation. Beyond getting him completely out of the child's life, what more do you want?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP learning English will take you further with this.

Yes. What country are you from? That may be framing your legal perspective.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thanks for all the responses.

I just want to say to am not fighting the un-supervised visitation at his home. But every case must be judge on its own merit.

Here are a few additions to my situation:

My ex is wealthy and has attempted to use his economic influence to sway a short time baby sitter to say things against me and others.

He fabricated tons of charges against me, none has no merits

He has 2 other special needs sons, one of them would not even talk to him

The women he meets online has manipulated him for money and some of them are on drugs. Has evidence of that.

He has repeatedly threatened to turn the carbon monoxide on in the room

And I will not mention the abuse I endured with him. I want my 7 months old son to be protected.


And he will be with supervised visitation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have to understand that the court looks after the best interest of the child involved. Him meeting women online has nothing to do with his parenting. The judge took into account that he has been seen by a medical professional and may not be the most stable mentally, which is why he said supervised visitation. My suggestion is to not fight it, you will be wasting time and money.

This.

And to be honest OP, you sound a bit crazy yourself. Did you really type "Does my lawyer have to report everything to me that was said in chambers?" YES! You have sole custody. Right now the children can only see their father when someone else is present to supervise.

And just so you know, a lot of really healthy, normal people meet others online. It's not a sign that someone is an irresponsible, crazy parent.

OP. Ignore this troll. As an attorney in Maryalnd I think supervised visitation says a lot about how the court views your ex. They do not trust him alone with your child. This will go 3 ways. He'll see your child and the supervising person will see he is really good with your child and supervision will eventually not be necessary. Or the supervisor will report back that he's nutz and this is not in the best interest for your child, lastly, your ex will think this is too much work and won't bother trying to see him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thanks for all the responses.

I just want to say to am not fighting the un-supervised visitation at his home. But every case must be judge on its own merit.

Here are a few additions to my situation:

My ex is wealthy and has attempted to use his economic influence to sway a short time baby sitter to say things against me and others.

He fabricated tons of charges against me, none has no merits

He has 2 other special needs sons, one of them would not even talk to him

The women he meets online has manipulated him for money and some of them are on drugs. Has evidence of that.

He has repeatedly threatened to turn the carbon monoxide on in the room

And I will not mention the abuse I endured with him. I want my 7 months old son to be protected.


And he will be with supervised visitation.

Really?
Supervised visitation is not a guarantee .

[Anonymous]

If she judge recommended it? What's the alternative? No visitation?