|
We have 3 kids. We had no problems sharing a room with the older 2 while on vacation but for some reason, if DS3 (1 y.o.) is in the same room as us, he is up THE ENTIRE NIGHT. We were just with family and he did not sleep at all - not in the pack n play, not in our beds, not nursing, nothing. And he normally sleeps through the night with no problem. On the 2nd night, we finally moved the pnp to the playroom and he slept his longest stretch (2.5 hrs).
So while we used to be totally flexible and could all sleep in a closet together, I wont go on vacation with him unless he has his own space. |
| While it's great that you come from a family of sound sleepers, people (and that includes children) have different noise tolerance levels when it comes to sleeping. My first child- slept like a rock. Second wakes up if he hears a cricket chirp outside, which sets off an ugly chain of events when you're sharing a room and bed (wakes up other kid, then wakes us up). And that makes for a not fun vacation. Your post actually sounds like you are a little jealous of those of us that can travel and get an extra room/suite. |
| Exactly as the pp said. Since we have a baby we can all go to bed at his bedtime (6:00 pm) and take naps otherwise he will never go to sleep if we are awake. Not sure why it is hard for OP to understand that babies who are used to sleeping in their own rooms do much better.if they are able to sleep in their own space on vacation. Plus, as PP mentioned being able to enjoy alone time with your spouse and have sex is nice too! Personally, I want my baby to get a good night of uninterrupted sleep and I don't want to go to bed when it's daylight outside. |
|
We almost never stayed in a hotel as a child. When we did (maybe 3 times ever) we had two rooms - I shared with my mom and brother shared with my dad.
Now, whenever we can, we get two rooms, but it's not required. DD #1 snores. DS wets the bed. DD#3 grinds her teeth. DH and I like to have some 'adult' time and actually get some sleep if we can. |
Congrats, you have (and seem to always have had) good sleepers. For those of us who don't, vacations sharing one room aren't enjoyable bc no one sleeps and then everyone is miserable. |
|
When DD was a baby, she would NOT sleep in the same room as us. It was a disaster. We used to always get suites, or rooms that had a little nook that we could tuck her PNP in so we can sneak onto the bed. It was a disaster everytime we tried to sleep in the same room as us. And that led to no sleep for anyone.
She grew out of that at 2, and now she can sleep in the same room as us because she understands more. And now it's downright like a sleepover! She LOVES it. Now that we are expecting again, we will try the one room thing again. But we will pay attention to her personality, and if a suite is right for her as well, we will deal with it. Hopefully she sleeps fine in a room with us. But if no one is getting rest, and vacations are more stressful sharing, we would do the suite thing again until the next one understands. My parents didn't have money to travel when we were younger, so we didn't really go many places until we were older and my parents were better settled. Definitely not when we were babies though. So not sure what they would have done if we were babies that kept wanting to nurse every 5 minutes when they were sleeping in the same room as mom. |
|
I seriously dislike sharing a "plain" room with our 3 yo. If it has a space that we can close off in some way, that's fine. like an Exec Suite type situation. But the early toddler bedtime issue, as well as keeping him in his own bed makes me not feel rested when we're all piled in (which we've done when necessary). With another on the way, I will be even more likely to want a suite arrangement because I do not want the baby and toddler to disturb each other.
|
|
My kids go to bed at 6:30 or 7, and they won't sleep unless it's dark. I also don't want to worry about lights/toilets flushing waking them up so that they are miserable the next day.
A suite, or two connecting rooms just gives us more room to spread out without being on top of each other. We didn't vacation that much when I was younger, but when we did, it was either 1 hotel room or a 1 bedroom apartment. Yes, I'm more high maintenance than my parents, and I have a bigger budget. |
| I don't think there were as many suite hotel options when we were kids. We stayed at embassy suites a few times when I was a kid and we all loved it, compared to the five of us sharing a room. If there had been other affordable options like there are now, I bet we would've stayed there. |
|
My DH's family will all share a room NOW. It honestly weirds me out -- his two parents, a 21 yo daughter, DH and our son, all in one space. The room might have 2 beds or bed+sofabed plus sleeping bag/cot for daughter.
I feel awkward enough sharing a rental condo type arrangement with them where we have our own bedroom, so refuse to go along when they're doing one of these single room arrangements. His family camped and stayed in relatives' houses and such growing up, because his parents are cheap (not poor, just cheap). I don't think they often stayed in hotels that even had suite options. Mine didn't ever do that, so I think that's why they see it as normal and I see it as weird. I can only think back to a couple of occasions where my family didn't at least have a suite w/sofabed or rollaway for me. So I think it's probably one of those "family norms" where you're used to it or not. DH and I don't have as large of a travel budget yet as my parents have for the last 15 years, but having a good size space will be on my priority list for trip planning. EG, I would sacrifice airline expense (less exotic destination) to get better accommodations (suite). |
Well, I just have to roll my eyes a bit that you don't seem to recognize how fortunate you are to have such good sleepers, and that not all families are quite so blessed. |
I am rolling my eyes at you. 6 people in one room sucks. |
Another +1 We usually try to get a suite or even two adjoining rooms now that the kids are bigger. When the kids were very little they slept in the "living room" part in their pack-n-play or the sofa bed so DH and I could hang out in the bedroom. Now they are 9 and 10, we usually put them to bed in the bedroom and we use the living room. If we are only in a hotel for 1 nite, we'll just get one regular room and prob let the kids stay up a bit later. Early bedtimes for the kids are important to us, but one kid also gets up at the crack of down, so if we want to enjoy our time the extra space is worth it. If we're going to be someplace for more than 2-3 nites, I typically look for a rental house/apartment because that's usually a more affordable way to get more space plus being able to cut down on restaurant meals. When I was growing up, in a family with three kids, we took a number of long trips with lots of nights at motels. It was always 1 room with 2 double beds plus a roll-out. |
| I can't believe OP had 4 kids who would stay asleep on transfer from car to hotel room, and who would not wake up while she relaxed and watched TV. |
|
Both of our families had 3 kids each. DH's family didn't go on many vacations when they were younger except for camping. My family all shared one room.
We've only gone to a hotel 4 times since our eldest was born (she's currently 2.5). First time we had to stay in a hotel b/c my brother lives in Manhattan and they have absolutely no room. We stayed in jersey at an embassy suites. We stayed in the living room and put DD in the bedroom. There was too much noise in the hallway b/c of the open architecture. 2nd and 3rd time we did the reverse. The reason is pretty much the same as everyone else who posted previously. Our daughter used to go to bed at 7 to 7:30 pm and we could not go to bed that early. Most recently we were invited to a family gathering and shared a room w/ our DD. She slept in the pack and play as she normally does but since it was a multi-room condo, we were able to be out of the bedroom until we were ready to sleep. It'll be interesting now that we have a 2nd baby. Most likely won't be traveling too much. |