|
Withdrawals from any retirement account (such as TSP or 401k) are taxed at ordinary income rates, not cap gains.
"Most" people consider 4% withdrawal to be a perfectly fine/conservative withdrawal rate. Bogleheads tend to be savers, and there are a lot of them who tend to be conservative in their assumptions, so you can certainly find discussions there about lower "safe withdrawal rates" but I think they are overstated. I don't think the SS supplement plays a big role in retirement planning for most people--i think it runs about half of your SS benefit and only lasts from retirement to age 62. |
|
This impacts how much you think you will need in retirement to maintain your lifestyle. When you are paying into your TSP the contributions are not taxed and your taxable income is therefore lower. So, if you earn $100,000 and save 10% in your TSP, your taxable income is just $90,000. If you retire at age 66 and your pension, social security benefit and TSP annuity all add upto 90% of your working income, the entire amount (in my simple example, $90K) is subject to income tax and none to capital gains tax. In other words, because you don't need to save for retirement anymore, you may need less income to maintain your lifestyle in retirement. I assume payroll taxes are taken out of the $100K annual income while you work but not out of the $90K annual income when you are in retirement. So my hypothetical worker only needs to replace 83% (approx.) of pre retirement income now that he does not need to contribute 10% to a TSP and does not need to pay (7%) payroll taxes. Anyone know how health insurance works? Right now, we pay just under $5000 in premiums every year (approx.) but this is not taxed. Does our contribution stay the same in retirement (is the govt. match the same for retired workers?). Is the premium tax-deductible in retirement too? |
<blush> Thanks! I took those retirement courses three times over the course of my career which has helped, but still there's more to learn and to tweak. I have made some mistakes over the years-- not really big ones, like not contributing to TSP, but smaller things that I could have done better. It's very hard to figure everything out and the landscape keeps changing. One thing that I'm noticing in my workplace is that the CSRS folks had it SO much better. Depending on their age, they are retiring with 70% or more of their salary, plus whatever they were able to save on the side. It's such a better deal than FERS. They switched from CSRS to FERS in about 1984-1985 or so, so you are starting to see the first FERS retirees. They can only do it if their spouse is still working, or they have another job to go to right after retirement, or they sell their home here for a nest egg and then move somewhere with cheaper cost of living. The main rule for FERS is that retirement is a 3-legged stool: the FERS pension (approx 30-40% of your income, each 1.1% is equivalent to a year of service); the SS supplemental benefit or regular SS, depending on how old you are; and your own savings (TSP and other). A fourth leg would be any part-time or full-time work that you would start after you retire from the Feds, but there's an income cap on that to get the SS supplemental (I believe it's $17,000 per year). Anyway, GL OP! |
|
The difference between CSRS and FERS isn't as big as many people think because FERS retirees get SS-- in fact employees earning under 100k may be better off under FERS.
My impression is that health insurance for retired feds (if you meet the requirements to stay in FEHBP) is exactly like health insurance for employed feds except the premium is not paid pre-tax. |
that sucks - so that tax hit has to be budgeted for. It's nice that the employer premium match continues into retirement though because health insurance would be very expensive otherwise. |
No match on TSP contribution either I believe. |