Kind of feels like "something's gotta give", right? |
| No head scratching here. I think this is part of a larger problem in the economy. The gap between the super wealthy and everyone else is growing with every decade. I fear that soon there will be no upper middle class or middle class, just rich and poor. |
| rich, upper poorer class, and poor...lol...... |
I'm not the number-crunching PP, but her analysis does answer your question -- no, there wasn't as much angst about whether private school was worth it because tuition didn't take as big a bite out of family income. |
I am the number-crunching PP, and if i did the math right, I think it does answer that question as well. |
| Doesn't matter they can make it as high as they want if there is dwmand to pay it. |
True, but not relevant to the question asked. |
And here's a big piece of the problem: the families that have to scrape to afford $30k/year for private school are often putting off saving for the $60k/year colleges. My parents managed private school and also fully-funded our private college educations. For a middle class family, it's much harder today to manage both private school and private college. |
| No one that is middle class can afford either private school or college at full cost. |
Perhaps that's correct. If so, from a supply-demand perspective, private school education may have been underpriced previously. Or perhaps demand has increased. |
Yes!! I know that analogy. We have an HHI of 425K. Our kids go to public school. Our parents did not make nearly as much as we do. My DH and I both went to well known privates in the northeast. We are very happy in our public school. We tried private and it wasn't woryh the 30K in tuition that was a struggle for us a couple of years ago when our HHI was about 100K less. Plus, we couldn't relate to any of the families. There were no "normal" people. Most of our friends from growing up also send their children to public schools for many of the same reasons as us. |
Agree. We just pulled kids out of private school because we decided saving for college is more important and we can't do both. |
| all these posts make it sound like there is a significant attrition rate for privates, is that the case? |
Your whole premise is flawed because you are juxtaposing nationwide HHI figures with Washington-specific tuition. (My sister's tuition at a fine private high school in the Midwest $8,000. ) |
Not in my experience at my daughter's private. There's normal ebb and flow - some families move, some kids change schools at middle school or upper school, but it's a small amount. Fewer than 1 child/year left in her lower school career. Middle school looks similarly stable. As a data point, my daughter's last year in lower school cost ~120% what her first year cost. I think private schools would do people a service if they showed prospective families what a student graduating "now" (the year of application) had paid for an entire career at that school, and indicate what percentage tuition increase occurs each year. I think both the $ amount and the percentage can be important; I think a lot of people underestimate how much percentage increases can work out to be. Seeing actual dollar amounts (e.g. tuition increasing from 25K to 32K over 6 years) might better allow them to determine long term affordability. |