You could also look at the honor roll lists as a way to compare the schools...
http://connectedcommunities.us/forumdisplay.php?f=153 Obviously, you would expect magnet kids at either school to be honor roll, but this will give you a sense of how strong the total student body is academically. Takoma is strongest in that regard. That alone doesn't mean the school or program is superior. But it's another piece of data for comparison. |
There is no doubt that Math and Science are better at Takoma Park but English and World Studies are better at Eastern so it depends on what matters more to your child. Science is very mediocre at Eastern but I am not convinced it would be better at our "W" middle school. Most of the kids in advanced science are from the magnet program. I have been very happy with Math at Eastern - wonderful teachers and their Math club does well in competitions. If I remember correctly, they have held their own against TPMS. In sixth grade nearly a third of the magnet class is taking Algebra and most of the rest are in IM. Nearly all the children in Algebra and in IM are from the magnet program which might explain why Eastern's overall math performance is so poor (the magnet program contains 1/3 of the student body). The four core magnet classes (English, World Studies, Literature and the Humanities and Media) are excellent. We did agonize over the lack of an elective during school hours and the social environment in the school and the rundown appearance of the school but these things mattered more before my child entered the program. He is so happy and engaged and LOVES being at Eastern |
Wow. You're capable of reading a lot into a post that isn't there. My comments were about the program, the teaching staff, and the administration -- not the students. DC has amazing peers in the magnet. DC has also made a lot of friends in the comprehensive program. These are great kids too. DC has also witnessed some pretty disturbing fights at school and some pretty ugly sexual harassment. DC has also been exposed to some pretty tough family situations (which, IMO, is not really a bad thing). My post didn't say anything about the students. Nor did my post say anything about the physical plant (which, IMO, is old, but not terrible, and as such is not really an important consideration in placement). While it is a very nice sound bite to whine about building "another fancy addition onto a Chevy Chase school," you should look at the facts. For example, the BCC cluster will be getting a brand new middle school, not because the CC people are so rich, but because the school is currently over-enrolled and over-enrollment is projected to rise to 500-700 students from 2017-2028. By contrast, Eastern MS is currently under-enrolled, and even by 2028 is only scheduled to have 126 students more than capacity ( an overcapacity level Westland currently has and has had for awhile). Even though Eastern is not over capacity, it has been scheduled for a renovation, although that renovation has been pushed back by 2 years for completion in 2023. Although Eastern's renovation has been pushed back, five other middle schools in the same DCC with projected overcapacity by 2028 of less than 300 will begin planning this year or next for additions. What do you think is "fair"? To renovate a school to make it nicer even though there is currently enough room for all the students? Or to renovate a school that is currently overcapacity with an absolutely unmanageable overcapacity projected? IMO, what's not "fair" about the contrast in the two situations is that Eastern is not a great school, and because of that, parents with kids don't move to the neighborhood or send their kids to private, creating a self-perpetuating downward spiral of flight. The only thing that will break this is naming, shaming, demanding better, and getting vast amounts of magnet, non-magnet and neighborhood participation for change. Re: Distinguished Gentlemen programs. While it's great to have positive role models at school for the boys, I think that "role models" are far from the totality of what these kids need. Those in DG who have bad grades need really intensive, useful support at school so they can catch up, learn how to work effectively in class, get good grades and experience success themselves, not just have it role-modeled for them. DC sees many of these DG kids stuck with bad teachers and going nowhere because of it (although some DG are in the magnet). They also need teachers who do not treat minority students differently than non-minority students. DC sees a lot of subtle (and not so subtle) racism in the classroom/school, with minority students being judged differentially in a more harsh manner for academic and behavioral failures and SES status, while their non-minority peers often get the benefit of the doubt and some kind of support. So, I am not saying "don't go to Eastern". Every parent's calculus will be different. For us it was probably right to send this DC there, because the alternative was not great for entirely different reasons. Our option was to choose between 2 not great placements. But I wouldn't not even think for a minute to send my other kids there even though they are also very bright. I also think it's important to speak the truth about our experience, particularly since I know from other parents that our views are not unique. We know many families who either left or seriously considered it. What I hope by being honest is that more magnet and non-magnet parents go in eyes wide open, ask questions about what's going on, complain and hold the administration responsible. Eastern is capable of being a GREAT school, but it needs better, more imaginative leadership. |
Agree with one of the PPs that it really depends on whether your child is more into humanities or math/science. There is a reason why one is the humanities magnet and one the math.science magnet. Both are good programs. |
OP - Child selected Takoma Park Magnet for science content. All three schools TPMS, Eastern and Tilden seemed like great options after the visits. |