| I don't. I want them both to go to the right college that will enable them to achieve their goals in great company. If that school happens to be a top school, so be it, but we're after a great education, not just a name. |
You can keep repeating the same since it obviously makes you think you are witty but it really does not work like that anymore. No one gets in unless the grades/test scores/extracurriculars are on par even for legacies and development cases. I've interviewed for them for years and have many friends who are "hooked" with admissions. Fact of the matter is that I would not even encourage DC to apply unless it was a good fit. |
|
I didn't. I just wanted them to go to schools they'd find interesting and that would help them reach their goals.
DS wound up at Stanford and I kept encouraging him to look at schools closer to home (on the East Coast). DD wound up at Berkeley and while part of it was the environment, I think she wouldn't have gone had DS not been nearby. |
I guess i don't see my 20s as having been so bad that I need to make sure my progeny avoids it. So maybe I had to prove myself more than some others did, that's not really a hardship is it? |
OP, what are your own thoughts on these questions? Do you want your children to attend your Ivy League School, or any top college? I am curious about your thoughts on these same issues. |
|
| Many typos above, please forgive me. |
|
I want my child to be capable of being admitted to, and attending at, any top university. Why? Because I want her to be well-educated enough to have that world of options open to her.
But ultimately, if she chooses not to apply to or attend a top university, I'm fine with that too. I just want it to be her choice, and not a door that's closed to her because of lack of preparation. |
This. Between this and the fact that the perceived quality of peers is also important now (fair? not, but important), the idea of missing out on a top opportunity could easily translate into little or no opportunity. |
+1 |
I think this is true, and I went to one of those schools. And in the south, no less. I want my kids to care more about football tailgating every weekend, and what bowl game "they" end up going to. |
+2 Seriously, how bleak is that? |
That's a good point. I also grew up in the south, and many of my friends & classmates (>50%) went to SEC schools. Most of them really seem to have been limited by their college experiences. Maybe the world is more fluid and open now, so more post-college options would be available. But I'd rather my child have as much exposure as possible to other options. |
| It usually -not always - gives you more opportunities in life. Say your kid decides she wants to major in art history. Sure makes a lot more sense to do it Yale than...UMD for instance. |
The key word is "options." As we let our kids go and they make their own decisions, the best we can provide for them is a range of options. It is a reasonable inference that the better the school, the more options available to the graduates. Of course, if the better school is not the right "fit" and the student will not achieve in that environment, then the fact that a school is higher ranked does not make it the better school for that student. So, that is why you will see an Ivy League qualifier choosing to go to a Notre Dame or a UVa -- the fit is better. With so many forks in the road in terms of careers and opportunities, a parent who does not help their child maximize their options is not helping the student prepare for the future. The "I want them to be happy" answer sounds good, but it is not mutually exclusive with helping the child find the right college that will open the most doors. |