And surely it's a form of blasphemy to not only pretend to know the mind of God, but to presume to get offended on His behalf. |
|
I heard that joke a few years ago and loved it. I can't say whether it's because I'm an atheist, despite that, or totally independent of it. I saw it as a warning not to presume to know how God is supposed to act, and that if there is a God, He finds ways to act through natural laws and human kindness.
The God I would believe in if I wanted to call myself a believer, is the Creator that made the stars and galaxies and atoms and bosons, and made matter that formed itself into living cells that evolved into ever more complex flowers, trees, kangaroos and men, rather than following entropy and diverting back to chaos; a God Who is so far beyond our comprehension that it makes no sense to try to apply human terms like good or evil; a God who could no more walk amongst us that we can enter an ant-hill. Jesus as teacher or prophet I can comprehend, and I can understand being a Christian to follow his teachings. Or a Muslim, since he is one of ther prophets. Or a Jew, since he taught Judaism. By my words you should know me. |
This is an interesting point, and I tend to agree. Of course, the implication here is that "God" is just as likely to be what we would consider "evil" as "good". |
| No. When the Bible was written by people BTW, they didn't know about such things and said the earth was flat. I am a believer in God, consider myself a Christian, but the Bible is just an explainer for the masses from a much simpler time in human history. |
Nonsense. Everything the Bible got wrong is a complex and intricate metaphor. Everything the Bible got right is clear evidence of inspiration by a higher power. Heads I win; tails you lose. |
Okay. |
|
Anyone notice that the initials HB also stand for Holy Bible?
(Just feeling silly -- I think anyone who feels that science is a threat to religion ought to be taught that the Inquisition ended centuries ago.) |
| The humour above has a serious side within the Christian Church. Often people rely on divine intevention, when in fact common sense waits to point to the solutions around us. Sadly faith in God can display fanatical behaviour - elements of fundamental Christianity has a lot to answer for, e.g. where mindsets have been disturbed through the encouragement of fanatical teachings. John, Oxford UK |
|
And to follow on from my post above, getting to the actual subject matter, yes science and Biblical Creation are compatible. Mainy fundamentalist Christians would question this - I did years ago but for healths sake escaped from unhealthy pentecostalism and began thinking for myself, including puttting my interpretation on scripture, leaving behind "the you must believe this syndrome...or else!!!".
John Oxford UK |