Once you get the job you can revisit the pantyhose issue. I don't know how helpful your friend is. Did anyone mention that BigLaw is rather cut throat? |
| Pant suit, no question. |
| Wear them. And this is coming from an ex-lawyer who hasn't worn hose in five years. Law is still a pretty conservative profession and interview attire always errs on the side of conservatism. Better safe than sorry. Once you get the job I bet you can ditch the hose all or most of the time : ). |
| Find a really sheer pair of panty hose. Less dorky, IMO. |
+1 |
? Your friend is wrong. Of course you should wear panty hose to an interview at a conservative law firm. And you might want to maintain a little healthy skepticism of your friend's input in future. |
| Ok, I may just be a big dork, but I go to court a few times a month, and would feel creepy wearing a skirt suit and no pantyhose. I haven't interviewed anyplace in many, many years, but would feel weird at a hearing/oral argument with bare legs. |
This post is by far the most nonsense-filled post of the day. I bet you do that law firm of yours proud, girlie! |
Exactly! Stinky, sweaty, gross. |
+1 |
This makes no sense. Your legs are a lot less likely to be stinky or sweaty when you're not wearing pantyhose. I'm sure there are good reasons to wear pantyhose, but if you're showering regularly, preventing stinkiness should not be one of them. |
Thanks for chiming in, Heather. |
I am part of my firm's hiring committee, and I can't say that "dorkiness" is a factor that I think about when interviewing. I think - can this person do the work? Do they seem like a team player? Do they have an obnoxious personality? Can they behave like a normal human being in front of clients? |
+1, really? this wasn't part of your law school curriculum?
|
+1. I a lawyer in Biglaw and on the hiring committee. And I would definitely expect pantyhose if you are wearing a skirt. |