Private versus public

[Anonymous]

Dissecting is disgusting and would not want my k kid doing this. Which private? We are in private as well but this is over the top.

[Anonymous]

My kid did owl pellets in public, but maybe in 1st or 2nd grade. Although I think there's something to be said gmfor learning the parts of a flower, I guess the publics can't compete with orchid dissections, and the owl pellets in a higher grade must seem pathetic....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dissecting is disgusting and would not want my k kid doing this. Which private? We are in private as well but this is over the top.

I don't mind dissection, but a squid seems over the top for K, really conspicuous consumption. I guess dissecting a daisy is too prole? I'm also curious which school, unless this is satire.

[Anonymous]

Having done both, private is better. Just very expensive. "All" of the schools are "the best" in every state. Do you believe everything you read?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Having done both, private is better. Just very expensive. "All" of the schools are "the best" in every state. Do you believe everything you read?

Of course nobody takes everything they read on faith. But there are others on this thread besides you who have actual experience with both public and private, and several of us prefer public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have a child in a top-tier private and one in a well regarded public (MC.) Let me give you an example of differences I notice.

In science, my Kindergarted child in private was dissecting squid and using the squid ink to write. They built suspension bridges out of various materials. They created wind tunnels to understand tornadoes, etc. In pubic school, my Kindergarten child drew pictures of the parts of flowers and read books on hibernating animals. You can draw your own conclusions from this...

what private has K's dissecting squid?