| It's gorgeous but I'd be paranoid about spilling on it, esp. with kids. I also bet you'd wear it less than you think you would. It won't ever look quite right with blazer or sweater and hard to see where you'd wear it evenings (not quite casual/not quite formal). It's the sort of thing I sometimes buy b/c it's such a great deal and then realize later why it got marked down... |
| I like it. I'd wear it to work, maybe with nude pumps and an interesting shrug instead of a blazer. |
| I don't like it. Simple and boring -- looks like you could get the same thing for much less. And the dress looks like it's made of patches/squares? |
| The Cindy Mancini reference is killing me. So great! I don't love the dress, though. Kind of blah and not worth $300 IMHO. It might be great on, but it doesn't even look that fab on the model to me. |
| The dress is very blah, not worth 300 at all. |
| Thing is that you could ONLY wearing during the winter, maybe late fall. |
Completely agree...boring and just kind of "meh" |
| How do you feel in it? Do you feel like a thousand bucks? I agree that in the video it looks just OK, but if you feel amazing in it, go for it. |
| I love it. There are so many ways you could wear it, but I would tend to go with a blouse or a turtleneck underneath. I would not wear tall boots with a suede dress, but ankle boots would be cute. I think it's the kind of dress you will keep and love forever. |
| Love it. Especially if you have a body like the model's. Wish I did... |
|
Plain dress, not a complicated design so I'd rather have it in silk or cotton/linen for a helluva lot less $... Like 30$. Then spend the $ on a low range bag or heels for $250 or so.
A jacket you can take off during the day is one thing but who the hell wants to go around smelling like leather?? So not sexy! And gross for non leather wearers around you to have to smell all day. |
|
Sorry not a fan!
|
| Meh, for $310 you can do way better. |
| Yawn. Boring dress. Sorry. |
+1 Why spend that kind of money and not stand out? |