Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
The irony is that the hormones that everyone is worried about don't even make it into the milk, even in cows treated with it. Do people not know this, or do they not believe that it is true? I know there are other reasons for drinking organic milk, but I just don't see the logic in concern over hormones that don't end up in the milk anyway. |
Really? I thought there were various studies showing an increased level of IGF in milk produced by cows who were given additional hormones. I don't know for sure, just asking. Although I did find this: However, Yu and Rohan appear to be unaware of the fact that, since 1984, most of the nation’s milk supply has been contaminated with excess IGF levels resulting from the injection of cows with recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) to increase milk yields (3). Moreover, a substantial proportion of IGF in milk from rBGH-injected cows is in a more bioactive, unbound, protein-free form than is IGF in milk from untreated cows (4). In short-term oral administration experiments in rodents (5,6), IGF resists pasteurization and digestion, is readily absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, and has growth-promoting effects. Furthermore, converging lines of experimental and epidemiologic evidence (6) have incriminated excess IGF levels in rBGH milk as risk factors for breast and colon cancers. Confirmation of these concerns by an international expert committee prompted the January 2000 European ban on the marketing and sale of rBGH milk (7). Avoidance of rBGH dairy products in favor of natural products would thus appear to be the most practical and immediate “dietary intervention to . . . [achieve] the goal of preventing cancer” (1). SAMUEL S. EPSTEIN Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 93, No. 3, February 7, 2001 http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/93/3/238.1.full.pdf Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 93, No. 3, February 7, 2001 |