Exactly. Of course, OP is free to demonstrate the lack of knowledge of how medical care works here, but then it is still a nominally free country. We get to do all kinds of things that make us look silly. |
|
OP, the basic criterion by which prescribing providers are judged is whether they are following the standard of care for providers in that region. If you name the medication which has you concerned, the posters here can figure out whether that breaches standard of care. When you write "medication for a kid which should only be prescribed if person is at least 18yrs of ages," the only interpretation I can think of is that you are under the misapprehension that medications not "FDA approved" for children are somehow prohibited from being prescribed. As noted so many times above, that's just wrong. But if you post the medication name, we may well find out that the AAP or other professional organization actually lists it in standard protocols. We just won't know without the name. |
|
why not talk to the doctor and ask why they prescribed. as said before plenty of medications have studies that have been ongoing to allow for prescribing outside the approved windows while they await approval
|
Or even if the manufacturer never intends to apply for such pediatric approval. From the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP):
The AMA and AAFP have published similar statements consistent with this. However, it is possible that OP is referring to an explicit counterindication, which would be a different matter entirely. OP, what is the drug? |
| What is the drug? DS' life was saved by an off label use drug that hadn't been approved for kids his age. I am eternally grateful that the doctor had been keeping up to date on research and small studies being done. |