I feel like crap like that will happen in any large district. Even in DCPS you have a district imposing fines for ethics violations (working 2nd job on DCPS time) on an IS and then lets them continue keeping both jobs because DCPS is benefitting from the 2nd job. |
One way DCPS is different is the lack of tenure. In other districts observations and evaluations aren’t as punitive because you aren’t always at risk of losing your job. In DCPS you can be a highly effective teacher for years and then suddenly get developing and be at risk of getting fired. They have weaponized the evaluation system creating a culture of fear and resentment. Same for principals—they are looking out for their own evaluations. |
| Thank you for this topic. As mentioned it’s a corrupted system and all unions agree. It’s about how much can they do legally without getting into lawsuit. I believe principals should be rotated throughout the system. Different assignments to help them grow their leadership. Assignments with them leading ppl and not. Also, surveys don’t matter and teachers get retaliated on when they give anonymous feedback. No one is checking the system. |
Not surprised considering that’s how she ran her school before she’s was moved to Central Office involuntarily. The DCPS way.
|
| There are some truly wonderful DCPS principals too so the having a lot of power thing cuts both ways. |
Any thoughts on the immediate past principal at Marie Reed (not 25-26 one) who was there for so many years? |