| It sounds like it is for you. |
This. |
I’d say it correlates with the opposite. |
This, I would do ED again in a heartbeat, no stress is wonderful and kid happy. |
What? No. Tip top kids get in RD to T10/ivy, often more than one, sometimes 3 or 4, they do not need to ED and have the luxury of choice. |
Show the correlation. |
My kid applied ED and was accepted. Nothing weak about her - valedictorian, NMSF, 4.85 after junior year, 1550 one attempt, niche sport at state level, instrument since 3rd grade, strong and long held EC, part-time job…many strong students apply to their first choice ED. Not all gun for Ivy. |
Glad that your daughter is strong. Previous poster just saying that ED is an easier admit so weaker students can get in ED. |
[/b] This. |
If ED wasn't easier then RD, no one would choose to apply ED. |
o That’s not what the poster stated exactly. |
|
It’s a marker of privilege, mostly for the student. For the schools, it’s a way to attract and yield full pay students.
|
|
There is something needed clarification, OP:
Do you mean "is ED a marker of prestige" for the college/university, or the student? You can argue both sides for either, but for purposes of this thread, it would be helpful to know. |
| ED means you’re rich enough not to worry about financial aid (need or merit based) and you don’t want to deal with uncertainty. |
|
My kid looks down her nose at ED admits - she thinks it's easier than applying RD or EA.
I guess she's right but even if you apply ED to Vanderbilt or wherever - you still have to be a rock star to get in!! |