How come Epstien co-conspirators and abusers are still walking free?? 0 arrests.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just look at how Matt Gaetz has an “adopted son,” who already has a mother.

And look how Michael Johnson has an “adopted son,” who was very old when adopted.

Then add up 1 + 1.

Whether they SA boys or girls, they follow the same guidebook.

Yeah, I’m still wondering how this makes America great.

[Anonymous]

What I don't get is that the charges he was convicted on, and which were a part of the sweetheart deal he pled guilty to, was procuring a person under 18 for prostitution and soliciting a prostitute. That's either one or two events, maximum. How does that extend to what is likely literally hundreds of victims?

I know the wording was that the NPA entered into by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida included a promise not to prosecute Epstein for “any offenses that have been the subject of the joint investigation,” but surely there are details that weren't investigated at the time, given the scope of this. Why is this being held as a blanket immunity for everything? They didn't investigate everything. Surely they couldn't have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Because men protect men at the expense of girls.

No need to make this mindlessly sexist. Men protect men at the expense of young boys too. More importantly, people of all genders with money protect people of all genders with money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I mean god forbid I pull a pillow tag off or miss $1 on my taxes and I have a swat steam at my front door in the middle of night to arrest me.

There are tons of pictures of rich or academic shirtless men with man boobs next to teenage women, with testiomials from the victims that they were r**** and none of these guys have been arrested yet? WTF???

BTW the FBI/DOJ told everyone that there were no co-conspirators and abusers involved, what a crock of $hit. When people question the Charlie Kirk shooting thats why!

Because they have $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and have very powerful jobs and friends!

[Anonymous]

The whole system runs on Epstein. You can't prosecute or even investigate any of the willingly blackmailed politicians without bringing down the whole system.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The whole system runs on Epstein. You can't prosecute or even investigate any of the willingly blackmailed politicians without bringing down the whole system.

It’s coming down one way or another, might as be the good guys taking it down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A democrat appointee has never headed the FBI. That should be your clue.

Wrong - Freeh, Mueller, Webster

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A democrat appointee has never headed the FBI. That should be your clue.

Wrong - Freeh, Mueller, Webster

All registered Republicans, same as always. Webster did endorse both the Biden and Harris campaigns, but he remained a Republican.

PP didn't mean "appointed by a Democrat," but rather "appointee that was a Democrat."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Because you need witnesses who are willing to testify.
Because it is reported that some of these victims (and they are victims) settled for money. I've no idea if it is true, but it is certainly possible.
Sadly, some of the victims are reported to have been "procurers," as well. That complicates things. They would be vulnerable to prosecution, too.

But, mostly, money.

We've seen the photos with Andrew and Clinton. Not a good look. Andrew seems to be paying a price--though jail would be the real price. It also appears that some parents of the girls may have been complicit. Did they know?

What this really reveals is that this is not isolated.

A family member in DOJ said that he went to a training some years ago. A police investigator showed that within 15 minutes of putting up a page as a 14 year old vulnerable girl, the hits started coming in from all over the United States. Lots of hits.
Epstein was awful, but apparently, just the tip of the iceberg on pedophilia.

Hopefully, some will become more aware of this mess in society.

I'm no lawyer but I thought an NDA or cash settlement cannot take precedence over a criminal prosecution. If laws have been broken, victims cannot be held to a hush money or signed agreement for them to remain silent. Am I wrong?

Also, if this relates to what Acosta did, what gave him such broad and sweeping power? If it didn't cover Maxwell then why does it cover others? And how would anyone know who it does or doesn't cover? Why can't what Acosta did be reopened?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean god forbid I pull a pillow tag off or miss $1 on my taxes and I have a swat steam at my front door in the middle of night to arrest me.

There are tons of pictures of rich or academic shirtless men with man boobs next to teenage women, with testiomials from the victims that they were r**** and none of these guys have been arrested yet? WTF???

BTW the FBI/DOJ told everyone that there were no co-conspirators and abusers involved, what a crock of $hit. When people question the Charlie Kirk shooting thats why!

Because they have $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and have very powerful jobs and friends!

Anyone that powerful yet evil enough to victimize young women needs their money and power and freedom stripped from them. They are undeserving of all that society has bestowed on them. Full stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because you need witnesses who are willing to testify.
Because it is reported that some of these victims (and they are victims) settled for money. I've no idea if it is true, but it is certainly possible.
Sadly, some of the victims are reported to have been "procurers," as well. That complicates things. They would be vulnerable to prosecution, too.

But, mostly, money.

We've seen the photos with Andrew and Clinton. Not a good look. Andrew seems to be paying a price--though jail would be the real price. It also appears that some parents of the girls may have been complicit. Did they know?

What this really reveals is that this is not isolated.

A family member in DOJ said that he went to a training some years ago. A police investigator showed that within 15 minutes of putting up a page as a 14 year old vulnerable girl, the hits started coming in from all over the United States. Lots of hits.
Epstein was awful, but apparently, just the tip of the iceberg on pedophilia.

Hopefully, some will become more aware of this mess in society.

I'm no lawyer but I thought an NDA or cash settlement cannot take precedence over a criminal prosecution. If laws have been broken, victims cannot be held to a hush money or signed agreement for them to remain silent. Am I wrong?

Also, if this relates to what Acosta did, what gave him such broad and sweeping power? If it didn't cover Maxwell then why does it cover others? And how would anyone know who it does or doesn't cover? Why can't what Acosta did be reopened?

Prosecutor can't get a conviction on a "he said, she said" if she won't say anything.

[Anonymous]

I think we all know why this is. Friends of Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because you need witnesses who are willing to testify.
Because it is reported that some of these victims (and they are victims) settled for money. I've no idea if it is true, but it is certainly possible.
Sadly, some of the victims are reported to have been "procurers," as well. That complicates things. They would be vulnerable to prosecution, too.

But, mostly, money.

We've seen the photos with Andrew and Clinton. Not a good look. Andrew seems to be paying a price--though jail would be the real price. It also appears that some parents of the girls may have been complicit. Did they know?

What this really reveals is that this is not isolated.

A family member in DOJ said that he went to a training some years ago. A police investigator showed that within 15 minutes of putting up a page as a 14 year old vulnerable girl, the hits started coming in from all over the United States. Lots of hits.
Epstein was awful, but apparently, just the tip of the iceberg on pedophilia.

Hopefully, some will become more aware of this mess in society.

I'm no lawyer but I thought an NDA or cash settlement cannot take precedence over a criminal prosecution. If laws have been broken, victims cannot be held to a hush money or signed agreement for them to remain silent. Am I wrong?

Also, if this relates to what Acosta did, what gave him such broad and sweeping power? If it didn't cover Maxwell then why does it cover others? And how would anyone know who it does or doesn't cover? Why can't what Acosta did be reopened?

Prosecutor can't get a conviction on a "he said, she said" if she won't say anything.

Prosecutor can't get a conviction if he doesn't meet with the victims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think we all know why this is. Friends of Trump.

+10000 Congress and others with influence have to amass against him and his cronies and not only remove them from power but also remove their assets. Until that happens, I tend to think Americans have lost that special something we had back in 1776 when we had a little more gumption and stood up to those in power even if it put us and our communities at risk. Trump and his cronies do what they do because they understand they will never pay the price.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because you need witnesses who are willing to testify.
Because it is reported that some of these victims (and they are victims) settled for money. I've no idea if it is true, but it is certainly possible.
Sadly, some of the victims are reported to have been "procurers," as well. That complicates things. They would be vulnerable to prosecution, too.

But, mostly, money.

We've seen the photos with Andrew and Clinton. Not a good look. Andrew seems to be paying a price--though jail would be the real price. It also appears that some parents of the girls may have been complicit. Did they know?

What this really reveals is that this is not isolated.

A family member in DOJ said that he went to a training some years ago. A police investigator showed that within 15 minutes of putting up a page as a 14 year old vulnerable girl, the hits started coming in from all over the United States. Lots of hits.
Epstein was awful, but apparently, just the tip of the iceberg on pedophilia.

Hopefully, some will become more aware of this mess in society.

I'm no lawyer but I thought an NDA or cash settlement cannot take precedence over a criminal prosecution. If laws have been broken, victims cannot be held to a hush money or signed agreement for them to remain silent. Am I wrong?

Also, if this relates to what Acosta did, what gave him such broad and sweeping power? If it didn't cover Maxwell then why does it cover others? And how would anyone know who it does or doesn't cover? Why can't what Acosta did be reopened?

I'm not a lawyer, but what Acosta did seems corrupt. How was he not charged for covering up Epstein's crimes?