| It definitely can help if your kid is a stand out in the team. |
What a class act you are. Hopefully the kids turned out better. |
Don't underestimate the value of this element. |
| People make statements on this board as if they know for a fact it’s true. Don’t believe them. The top schools that also have competitive athletic programs are 100 percent recruiting in middle school. Ask me how I know. |
| NOPE. |
| If it’s the club run by the school’s coach, then yes. |
Do you have any idea how badly your post portrays yourself? |
If DC went to GC they would likely have better writing skills. |
| NO not really for MS |
LOL. What? Are you OK? |
| It's certainly better than not doing anything at all. |
|
I used to teach at the MS my son attended.
He was a pretty good athlete, but the school did not have his sport. He had peers who were training in ballet and a student who was training for the Olympics. Those students are great but they miss school a lot, and need a lot of time management. Many are part of travel teams and their plans could change on a dime. It is wonderful to have kids who can multi-task and who have passion, and maybe they can convey that in an essay or an interview, but they usually don't benefit the school by excelling in a field of interest off-campus. |
|
Unless your kid is a super star, no. Our school does bring some athletes in as middle schoolers.
But a solid club athlete is a dime a dozen among the kids already at the private, particularly in soccer and lacrosse. |
| There are so many soccer players and schools have A, B, and even some have C teams for MS soccer. Not true for lax, far fewer players, but a high number play club. |
It depends. It might be more relevant for girls because girls are almost done growing by 8th grade so if they are dominant in a sport at that age, you can predict they will continue to be dominant. If they are on the USA soccer development teams it will matter. If they are on mclean green team, not so much. |