I agree. The wellbeing notice is lazy and selfish. We all have to check our email throughout the evening and weekend in case there is an actual emergency, so I end reading a non urgent email because the person can’t be bothered to delay send. Then I’m thinking about it and maybe even responding when there was no reason we had to be doing that at night or on a Saturday. |
Also agree. |
Good grief - it's almost 2026 -- haven't you figured out how to schedule delivery of an email for the following morning? |
| I am a professional, late-50s, and have never had a scheduled lunch break and have worked multiple jobs (public, private, for profit and not for profit). A meeting at that time, I would bring my lunch and eat during the meeting, and would expect everyone else to do the same |
Good managers tell employees on the invite whether lunch will be served or if they should plan on eating before or after. |
The con of delaying delivery is that if other people’s emails on the same topic come in in the interim, your email could look like a confusing non-sequitur or be OBE. People may wonder whether you or not you though the other info was relevant |
| ^^ *whether or not you thought the other info was relevant. |
Get over it. I work with colleagues across the globe. You’re getting emails at weird times but you can set them aside until your normal work hours. Half the time it *is* normal working hours for some addressees when there are multiple people involved. |
Making people share a hotel room is inappropriate and unprofessional. I wouldn’t work anywhere where that was the expectation. She she’s demonstrating that her time is less valuable than $100, which isn’t a good reflection of her worth to the organization. |
NP here. I don’t mess around with lunch. Why can’t you eat a big lunch at 11? That’s what I would do. |
I’m a 50 yo senior level professional and have never attended nor ever planned a meeting that covered a period of more than one hour when people traditionally eat and not served food. If the meeting is from 12-1, everyone can eat before or after. If it’s from 11-2, the planner needs to serve lunch. To not do so shows a complete disregard for the meeting attendees, is rude and unprofessional. |
|
I would clarify if lunch was being served at the meeting: “are we ordering lunch or should I eat beforehand?”. Likewise, if I forgot to mention lunch in the calendar invite, I would expect someone to ask me.
As for working at all hours, it’s not a huge deal as long as: 1) culture (not a wellness disclosure) dictates non-emergency work is not required after business hours, and 2) your boss is actually available during said business hours. I once had a boss who was routinely MIA during the workday but would email/text/message all night and weekend, which meant if I needed to interact my with boss, I was working his hours, regardless of any “wellness” message in his email signature. |
| My old boss had obvious ADHD. She was always all over the place and everyone talked about it. You’d be in her office for a meeting and she’d be scrolling the internet looking at shoes or something. Then around 6:00, she’d get stressed (likely because she didn’t get anything done all day) and starts calling everyone on the team asking for things. Everyone got extremely frustrated by the fact that they worked all day and she didn’t seem to really start working until everyone else was ready to sign off. I worked for her for a year and a half before I found a new job. My new boss gives me 100% attention in meetings and at the end of the day is always telling us to sign off, whatever we’re working on can wait. |
I’ve always worked in the private sector (as an attorney) so perhaps my experience is skewed, but very few people bring their lunch. They’re always ordering in. Grocery shopping and packing a lunch takes time I don’t have. |
| The husband must cheat on her. |