|
1. Williams
2. Princeton 3. Dartmouth Focus on undergraduate teaching |
And, hello, UChicago DOES have engineering, and it's not ABET because they didn't want to be constrained, similar to the TOP engineering schools, like Caltech. |
| I think it is a false distinction. You cannot and should not attempt to rank colleges in a linnear fashion. |
Chicago is bad for engineering. I don't get your point. |
Says who??? It's the actual interesting type of Engineering, ABET is ABET, the same stuff. |
| I’d add Carnegie Mellon to the list. |
Shut up. |
|
Harvard
Yale Princeton Stanford MIT UC Berkeley UCLA Northwestern Rice Claremont Consortium (5Cs) |
No. You can just carry on your life instead of throwing tantrums when you don’t like something! |
Claremont booster. Disregard their opinion. |
|
Harvard
MIT Caltech Princeton Berkeley EECS or PhD |
Why even rank Berkeley? |
Eh? My oldest isn't in college yet. How can I be a booster of something where I didn't go and my kid hasn't gone? I put in 5Cs because I don't think any one LAC on it's own stands up to the rest, but since the Claremont Consortium is unique in that you have access to nearly all the resources of the group and the consortium includes some real stand outs like Pomona, CMC and Mudd, it rises above any other single LAC (and there are obviously individual LACs that arguably better than Pomona alone but when you combine it with the power of all the consortioum, it's hard to beat! |
I like this list ... |
|
Williams
Amherst Princeton Dartmouth Carleton Pomona Middlebury Davidson Rice Wake Forest |