My kids are at Claremont (also a non-Montessori option school) and they seem to use iPads more than I'd like - for math apps as referenced, but also Lexia (reading app) and my upper elementary student has done google slides/ppts on their iPad. I get the benefit for more tailored learning in math/reading but given what I understand to have been challenges with the way kids were using iPads (writing to each other/commenting on things), not sure the juice is worth the squeeze at the elementary level. |
My kids attended one of the immersion elementary use, and iPad use varied wildly by teacher/grade. Some barely used them at all, some heavily, and others in the middle. I suspect this is true at some other schools as well. |
Umm are ur kids at ATS? ATS students use screens - specifically Lexia and dream box. |
It isn’t amazing because what you are saying is simply incorrect. |
Again wrong. ATS students do not use iPads for homework. They do not bring iPads home. They use them in the class room. |
Like most things APS, these tools benefit struggling and lower performing learners, as alluded to because it doesn’t reinforce the deeper more self-motivated learning skills which are necessary in more advanced classes. To get you to the point you can manage a cash register or POS terminal, great. Matrix algebra, where you need to manage simultaneous arithmetic operations across multiple dimensions or integrating to find the area between two curves. |
Just wanted to provide more clarification. ATS students use their iPads for lexia, dreambox and reflex. The default is not to bring iPads home but some teachers allow parents to request the iPad coming home so that their kids can spend additional time on these apps. For lexia they are only allowed to use it for 20 mins a day I believe. Not sure about dreambox and reflex. I sometimes wonder who these ppl are on dcurbanmom that completely make up stuff. It’s pretty pathetic that someone would pretend to be an ATS parent just to stir up discussion on this site. Are people that lonely and bored? |
These tools are terrible for struggling learners. They get caught in endless cycles of never being able to advance. Ideally the teacher catches and helps the kid work on the skill they are struggling on. But mine have just struggled endlessly without teacher intervention and hate using these apps now. |
Maybe these apps but in general that is the consensus for edtech |
+1. Demand for ATS is huge. I wish they at least would have a 2nd school just like it. |
Because it would empty all the involved parents from mainstream elementary schools. Leftover schools would plummet. Same as HBW. |
ATS definitely uses Dreambox and Lexia on iPads. |
Let me just chime in to say Reflex is horrible for remediation tool especially for a child with dyscalculia. I was taught math the traditional way and have dyscalculia but moved pass it thanks to writing out math problems on paper. Reflex goes super fast and should be eliminated. My child with same disability in math is struggling thanks to Ipad overuse. Dreambox and Edmentum are decent to supplement work, but should not be over used. |
Reflex is basically math facts flash cards. It was fabulous for both my kids. The fact it's fast means kids can knock out a math fact practice quickly, getting through many facts and automating recall. It wastes far less time than Dreambox, which is laggy and slow and not challenging. I don't think Reflex is meant for remediation. It's for practicing math facts quickly and speeding up recall. It's literally my favorite APS app. |
APS misuses and overuses these apps. |