This. |
+1. If she acts as poorly as you fear, it may help you get rid of her. |
My observation (no personal experience) is that no one on PIP will actually retain their job. PIPs are just cruel ways of prolonging the decision to fire someone. Just give them severance and send them on their way unless you’ve clearly and honestly laid out an achievable way to retain her position. |
OP - I really don't want to PIP the employee... we are short staffed already. However, the work product is not up to par, and prior attempts to get them to complete a better work product have not been productive. My HR and Legal teams make us go through the process. |
Sure, but it also provides warning to try to find another before you’re fired. And it avoids expensive litigation. |
| Why PIP? I was in that situation and was just let go no notice, got severance. No explanation. I signed NDA and moved on. What is point of PIP. |
To give the employee a chance to improve. I was placed on a PIP since I was a long time employee and then I followed the requested steps and then went back to normal. Worked there for a few more years in fact. |
Depends on the reason. If it's quantity of production, they can usually get that up. If it's quality, unlikely to improve in my experience. |
| Just have a few canned phrases ready: I'm sorry you feel that way. It's all spelled out in the documents. I understand. |
That was my observation as well. The PIP was always a human glue trap. The person survives briefly but is stuck getting fired. It would be more humane to let them go. Pay them to nothing for awhile then severance instead of giving the illusion that they will get unstuck by doing xyz. |
| Why on earth should someone who is a poor enough performer to be placed on a PIP be given a severance? You suck, your work sucks, here’s some money so you won’t sue me? |
+1 Adding "the decision is final." |
| I have not read this whole thread but it’s super important to have as many witnesses to this conversation as practical. Never do it alone. |
No. A PIP is for performance and that’s something a manager addresses not HR. HR is just there as a buffer and a witness. Performance management is literally a big part of being a manager and OP has to do their job |
Because life isn’t black and white. Most jobs aren’t you suck or you’re a rockstar. Most employees are in the middle and bringing someone’s performance up can be less expensive and easier than firing and hiring and training a new person… who also might not do well. A severance usually requires an employee sign something agreeing to not take legal action against the employer and can save everyone a headache. |